These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1528505)

  • 21. [Which programmable functions of pacemakers are available, and what is their clinical relevance?].
    Jung W; Manz M; Lüderitz B
    Herz; 1991 Jun; 16(3):158-70. PubMed ID: 1889791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electromagnetic interference of implantable unipolar cardiac pacemakers by an induction oven.
    Hirose M; Hida M; Sato E; Kokubo K; Nie M; Kobayashi H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 15955187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Inhibition and triggering of heart pacemakers by muscle potentials].
    Jost M; Schelker D; Steinmann E; Hoffmann A; Burkart F
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1588-91. PubMed ID: 7156953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methods for testing automatic mode switching in patients implanted with DDD(R) pacemakers.
    Lau CP; Mascia F; Corbucci G; Padeletti L
    Ital Heart J; 2004 Jan; 5(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 15080575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [External thoracic stimulation (chest wall stimulation) in the study of patients with demand pacemakers].
    Fantini F; Franchi F; Padeletti L
    Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1972; 17(5):237-42. PubMed ID: 4671762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do induction cooktops interfere with cardiac pacemakers?
    Irnich W; Bernstein AD
    Europace; 2006 May; 8(5):377-84. PubMed ID: 16635999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Study of myopotential inhibition of unipolar QRS-inhibited (VVI) demand pacemakers].
    Aida H
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Aug; 30(8):1374-85. PubMed ID: 7142768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EKG of the month. Unipolar pacemaker inhibition due to increased skeletal myopotentials.
    Campbell WB
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1982 Aug; 75(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 7132344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies.
    Trigano A; Blandeau O; Souques M; Gernez JP; Magne I
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 15766826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Does electromagnetic interference not occur to a bipolar pacemaker during TUR-P?].
    Takahashi T; Matsuoka N; Ohshima T; Uchihashi Y; Satoh T
    Masui; 2004 Jan; 53(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 14968601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The interference of electronic implants in low frequency electromagnetic fields.
    Silny J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2003 Apr; 96 Spec No 3():30-4. PubMed ID: 12741329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Device management of arrhythmias after Fontan conversion.
    Tsao S; Deal BJ; Backer CL; Ward K; Franklin WH; Mavroudis C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Oct; 138(4):937-40. PubMed ID: 19660377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporary inhibition of permanently implanted demand pacemakers.
    Latif P; Ewy GA
    Circulation; 1977 Jan; 55(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 830215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of electromagnetic interference on implanted cardiac devices and their management.
    Yerra L; Reddy PC
    Cardiol Rev; 2007; 15(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 18090066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Myopotential inhibition of demand pacemakers: etiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations.
    Berger R; Jacobs W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Nov; 2(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 95221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chest-wall and transesophageal stimulation in the functional evaluation of patients with permanent pacemakers.
    Cotoi S; Caraşca E; Incze A
    Med Interne; 1988; 26(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 3244991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [In vitro study of the effects of high frequency electrical current on cardiac pacemakers].
    Chauvin M; Crenner F; Brechenmacher C
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Jun; 83(7):997-1002. PubMed ID: 2114861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update.
    Hekmat K; Salemink B; Lauterbach G; Schwinger RH; Südkamp M; Weber HJ; Mehlhorn U
    Europace; 2004 Jul; 6(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15172661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Capsule endoscopy and cardiac pacemakers: investigation for possible interference.
    Bandorski D; Irnich W; Brück M; Beyer N; Kramer W; Jakobs R
    Endoscopy; 2008 Jan; 40(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 18067067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.