These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Maximum likelihood haplotyping for general pedigrees. Fishelson M; Dovgolevsky N; Geiger D Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 15802921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exact genetic linkage computations for general pedigrees. Fishelson M; Geiger D Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 1():S189-98. PubMed ID: 12169547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A system for exact and approximate genetic linkage analysis of SNP data in large pedigrees. Silberstein M; Weissbrod O; Otten L; Tzemach A; Anisenia A; Shtark O; Tuberg D; Galfrin E; Gannon I; Shalata A; Borochowitz ZU; Dechter R; Thompson E; Geiger D Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 29(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23162081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Globally multimodal problem optimization via an estimation of distribution algorithm based on unsupervised learning of Bayesian networks. Peña JM; Lozano JA; Larrañaga P Evol Comput; 2005; 13(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 15901426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient recursive linking algorithm for computing the likelihood of an order of a large number of genetic markers. Tewari S; Bhandarkar SM; Arnold J Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():191-8. PubMed ID: 17369637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new method for computing the multipoint posterior probability of linkage. Logue MW; Vieland VJ Hum Hered; 2004; 57(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 15192281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linkage problem, distribution estimation, and Bayesian networks. Pelikan M; Goldberg DE; Cantú-Paz E Evol Comput; 2000; 8(3):311-40. PubMed ID: 11001554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Waddell PJ; Kishino H; Ota R Genome Inform; 2002; 13():82-92. PubMed ID: 14571377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computational model of approximate Bayesian inference for associating clinical algorithms with decision analyses. Kamae IR; Greenes RA Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1991; ():691-5. PubMed ID: 1807692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blocking Gibbs sampling for linkage analysis in large pedigrees with many loops. Jensen CS; Kong A Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):885-901. PubMed ID: 10441593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient computation based on stochastic spikes. Ernst U; Rotermund D; Pawelzik K Neural Comput; 2007 May; 19(5):1313-43. PubMed ID: 17381268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal peeling order for pedigrees with incomplete genotypic information. Belonogova NM; Axenovich TI Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Jun; 31(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 17500037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies. Wojcik J; Forner K Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast computation of genetic likelihoods on human pedigree data. Goradia TM; Lange K; Miller PL; Nadkarni PM Hum Hered; 1992; 42(1):42-62. PubMed ID: 1555846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Space complexity of estimation of distribution algorithms. Gao Y; Culberson J Evol Comput; 2005; 13(1):125-43. PubMed ID: 15901429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sub-space greedy search method for efficient Bayesian Network inference. Zhang Q; Cao Y; Li Y; Zhu Y; Sun SS; Guo D Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):763-70. PubMed ID: 21741635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]