These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The unmet need for legal abortion services in the U.S. Tietze C; Jaffe FS; Dryfoos JG Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(5):224-30. PubMed ID: 1193220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion decision worries public hospital advocates. Tokarski C Mod Healthc; 1989 Jul; 19(27):3. PubMed ID: 10293741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The 1988 abortion referenda: lessons for the future. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):218-23. PubMed ID: 2806488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 1983 Supreme Court abortion decisions: impact on hospitals, a conflict with Baby Doe? Carlson RA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):2-7. PubMed ID: 10263291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion availability in the United States. Seims S Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(2):88, 93-101. PubMed ID: 7364033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Court stands by abortion. Press A; Camper D Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Antitrust implications of physician suppression of alternative health care providers. Dolan AK Women Health; 1979; 4(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 10244457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion in the United States, 1978-1979. Henshaw S; Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(1):6-7, 10-8. PubMed ID: 7011839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion clinics rush to diversify. Bus Week; 1979 Dec; (2615):68, 73. PubMed ID: 10244490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administrators face tough decisions as hospitals confront abortion issue. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1989 Jul; 63(14):52. PubMed ID: 2753484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of care: a future element of advertising? Hauser LJ Hospitals; 1986 Jul; 60(14):54. PubMed ID: 3721476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Significant issues in medicine and law 1978-1979. Erickson WH Trial; 1980 Feb; 16(2):23-7, 60-1. PubMed ID: 10245732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion laws will bend under new medical, social pressures. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ Hosp Prog; 1982 Dec; 63(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10257448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--freedom of the press--prohibition of abortion referral service advertising held unconstitutional. Singer ET Cornell Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 61(4):640-60. PubMed ID: 10242512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sustaining the prolife momentum: legal and political strategies. Wendel GD; Dunsford JE Hosp Prog; 1982 Dec; 63(12):70-3. PubMed ID: 10257451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion services in the United States, 1979 and 1980. Henshaw SK; Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(1):5-8, 10-5. PubMed ID: 7037447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High Court adds confusion, constraint to abortion issue. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug; 19(34):32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 10294508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]