486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15286170)
1. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bad papers by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Criticism with only little inhibitions?].
Henriksen P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Sep; 128(18):2087-8; discussion 2088. PubMed ID: 18846128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Criticism without inhibitions].
Aavitsland P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1377. PubMed ID: 18552894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [External and unbiased quality assurance of scientific manuscripts].
Nilsson BI
Lakartidningen; 2002 Nov; 99(45):4568-9. PubMed ID: 12469534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Should the Ugeskrift take in secondary publications without independent peer reviews?].
Hjøllund NH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2687; author reply 2687. PubMed ID: 16953547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
Rossner M
J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The dance about the "impact factor"].
Rehfeld JF; Nielsen LB; Jørgensen HL
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2317. PubMed ID: 17594848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [When the editor makes an error].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [A year with New England Journal of Medicine].
Bretthauer M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Oct; 129(19):1971. PubMed ID: 19823197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Registration of clinical trials--results included now!].
Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1535. PubMed ID: 18454920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Suggesting reviewers.
Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Why was my article refused?].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Jan; 171(5):303. PubMed ID: 19176154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility].
Holmgren PG
Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
Taylor D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 21-27; 105(21):1560-1. PubMed ID: 18574991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [What does the Tidsskriftet's editorial committee do?].
Rørtveit G; Staff A; Schem BC; Busund LT; Nakken KO; Walstad M; Dale O; Vigen T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jan; 129(3):175. PubMed ID: 19180158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
