These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1528702)

  • 1. Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects.
    Rock I; Mitchener K
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1528702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do young children reverse ambiguous figures?
    Rock I; Gopnik A; Hall S
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 7845757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ego depletion in visual perception: Ego-depleted viewers experience less ambiguous figure reversal.
    Wimmer MC; Stirk S; Hancock PJB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1620-1626. PubMed ID: 28229298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing reversals in ambiguous images: to know or not to know?
    Kosegarten J; Kose G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Aug; 119(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 25072901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tentative I/O curve with consciousness: Effects of multiple simultaneous ambiguous figures presentation on perceptual reversals and time estimation.
    D'Anselmo A; Pisani A; Brancucci A
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Mar; 99():103300. PubMed ID: 35182822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do ambiguous figures reverse?
    Rock I; Hall S; Davis J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Oct; 87(1):33-59. PubMed ID: 7985524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diverting subjects' concentration slows figural reversals.
    Reisberg D; O'Shaughnessy M
    Perception; 1984; 13(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 6527933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of ambiguous figure perception.
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2011 Apr; 76(1):vii, 1-130. PubMed ID: 21413993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?
    Long GM; Olszweski AD
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):41-71. PubMed ID: 10696278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual reversal of bi-stable figures in microgravity and hypergravity during parabolic flight.
    Clément G; Demel M
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Jan; 507(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 22188656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to keep a reversible figure from reversing: teasing out top-down and bottom-up processes.
    Long GM; Moran CJ
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 17455757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming effects with ambiguous figures.
    Goolkasian P; Woodberry C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 21312099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis and modification of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.
    Zelniker T; Jeffrey WE; Ault R; Parsons J
    Child Dev; 1972 Jun; 43(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 5034724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Nakamura N; Fujita K; Ushitani T; Miyata H
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 16893262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The microstructure of dual-task interaction. 4. Sleep deprivation and the control of attention.
    Fisher S
    Perception; 1980; 9(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 7454513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural processes in pseudo perceptual rivalry: an ERP and time-frequency approach.
    Yokota Y; Minami T; Naruse Y; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 271():35-44. PubMed ID: 24759770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alcohol disrupts the effects of priming on the perception of ambiguous figures.
    O'Brien C; Higgs S; Harris M
    J Psychopharmacol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24306134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: means do not make the difference.
    van Ee R; Noest AJ; Brascamp JW; van den Berg AV
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3129-41. PubMed ID: 16650452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous perception of both interpretations of ambiguous figures.
    Jensen MS; Mathewson KE
    Perception; 2011; 40(8):1009-11. PubMed ID: 22132516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of extraneous speech on visual vigilance performance of children.
    Brackup ES; Knopf IJ
    Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 679781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.