These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15287114)
1. Rethinking protections for human subjects. Gunsalus CK Chron High Educ; 2002 Nov; 49(12):B34. PubMed ID: 15287114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries. Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm? Nelson CH; McPherson DH NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research. Marshall PA Anthropol Q; 2003; 76(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 15112645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A taxonomy of value in clinical research. Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Where the innocent bear the consequences: lessons from an institution's IRB crisis. Warner RS Bull Park Ridge Cent; 2000; (18):11-2. PubMed ID: 15744913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council]. Shelton JD IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system. Mann H; Shamoo AE Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting human subjects. Kaufman D NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 15468468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval. Wichman A J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The nanny state meets the inner lawyer: overregulating while underprotecting human participants in research. Gunsalus CK Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):369-82. PubMed ID: 16625733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New waiver of regulations on research with prisoner-subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Aug; 18(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask? Koski G IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters. Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Module five: implementation of ethics review. Dhai A Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research. Noah BA J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform. Gandhi R J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Office of Human Research Protections. Chamberlain B Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]