294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15287135)
1. NIH begins review of studies that were questioned at a congressional hearing.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(11):A24. PubMed ID: 15287135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Election 2002 update: the fallout for NIH appropriations.
Olds JL
Anat Rec B New Anat; 2003 Jan; 270(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12526060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH urged to cap profits made on publicly funded research.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6791):5. PubMed ID: 10894508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Researchers accused of wanting to rob the poor to give to NIH.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6694):609. PubMed ID: 9716118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Washington Report. NIH: with friends like that..
Greenberg DS
N Engl J Med; 1980 Jun; 302(26):1490-2. PubMed ID: 7374726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NIH director responds to congressional inquiry about sexual behavior grants.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Mar; 96(5):350. PubMed ID: 14996854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. House of Representatives moves to dismantle NIH AIDS research program. National Institutes of Health.
Update Natl Minor AIDS Counc; 1995; ():6. PubMed ID: 11362790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Congress Passes 2006 NIH Reform Act.
Lang L
Gastroenterology; 2007 Feb; 132(2):474-5. PubMed ID: 17261310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. House approves NIH funding, "de-funds" two NIMH grants.
Physiologist; 2004 Oct; 47(5):382. PubMed ID: 15587608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. SBIR program. Researchers fight against bigger slice to small business.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5936):18. PubMed ID: 19574355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomedical politics. Sex studies 'properly' approved.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):741. PubMed ID: 14764836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National Institutes of Health. Report seeks stability for behavioral sciences.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1878. PubMed ID: 15591176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Opinions differ on spending NIH gold.
Nature; 1990 Dec 20-27; 348(6303):661. PubMed ID: 2259374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH--a balancing act.
Pollner F
Med World News; 1985 Jan; Spec No():28-31. PubMed ID: 10269823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
