214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15287139)
1. When good institutions behave badly.
Murphy TF
Chron High Educ; 2003 Dec; 50(17):B15. PubMed ID: 15287139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Subject's parents claim university was not responsive to their requests.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Sep; 15(9):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New initiative to accredit all institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11658058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask?
Koski G
IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters.
Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C
IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed.
del Guercio P
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Universities fear repercussions as NIH tunes conflicts policy.
Check E
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7010):725. PubMed ID: 15483566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rules of the game: institutional review boards.
Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 18375265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH conflicts rules are not right for universities.
Korn D; Ehringhaus SH
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):821. PubMed ID: 15829935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Researcher sues institutional review board (IRB) members and university.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):8. PubMed ID: 12814116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When a research subject calls with a complaint, what will the institutional review board do?
Motil KJ; Allen J; Taylor A
IRB; 2004; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 15281212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking protections for human subjects.
Gunsalus CK
Chron High Educ; 2002 Nov; 49(12):B34. PubMed ID: 15287114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
Cohen P
New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cornell University scientists face charges of fraud.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):810. PubMed ID: 16079859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Subject's parents say federal protection office had inherent conflict of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Aug; 15(8):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
