These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15288244)

  • 1. Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening.
    Jansen JM; Martin EJ
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2004 Aug; 8(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 15288244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
    Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    Drug Discov Today; 2007 Mar; 12(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 17331887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads.
    Alvarez JC
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2004 Aug; 8(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 15288245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
    Perola E
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of structure- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols considering hit list complementarity and enrichment factors.
    Krüger DM; Evers A
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Jan; 5(1):148-58. PubMed ID: 19908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. (3). New methods and old problems in scoring function design.
    Smith R; Hubbard RE; Gschwend DA; Leach AR; Good AC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 12798390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.
    Kontoyianni M; Sokol GS; McClellan LM
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 15526325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 18229906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand bias of scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Jacobsson M; Karlén A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1334-43. PubMed ID: 16711752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Ormsby DL; Lindvall MK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.
    Kitchen DB; Decornez H; Furr JR; Bajorath J
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 Nov; 3(11):935-49. PubMed ID: 15520816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.