These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15288440)

  • 1. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control.
    Handlovsky I; Hansen S; Lee TD; Elliott D
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 15288440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.
    Mendoza J; Hansen S; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Elliott D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):760-73. PubMed ID: 16223538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect.
    Rossit S; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1563-72. PubMed ID: 18771672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action.
    Keetch KM; Glazebrook CM; Lyons J; Lam MY; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(1-2):117-21. PubMed ID: 16901634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion.
    Króliczak G; Heard P; Goodale MA; Gregory RL
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16516866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.
    Alphonsa S; Dai B; Benham-Deal T; Zhu Q
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 25535018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception, action, and experience: unraveling the golden braid.
    Clark A
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1460-8. PubMed ID: 19026670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of online control: a developmental perspective.
    McKay SM; Weir PL
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2004; 25(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 15148001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye-hand coordination asymmetries in manual aiming.
    Lavrysen A; Elliott D; Buekers MJ; Feys P; Helsen WF
    J Mot Behav; 2007 Jan; 39(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 17251167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing.
    Lee JH; van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 11914789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions.
    van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Apr; 125(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 10323299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of task-constraints on the planning and control of interceptive hitting movements.
    Caljouw SR; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):84-9. PubMed ID: 16229948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.