These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15288450)

  • 1. A protocol for the assessment of 3D movements of the head in persons with cervical dystonia.
    Carpaneto J; Micera S; Galardi G; Micheli A; Carboncini MC; Rossi B; Dario P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Aug; 19(7):659-63. PubMed ID: 15288450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
    Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects.
    Lansade C; Laporte S; Thoreux P; Rousseau MA; Skalli W; Lavaste F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2900-6. PubMed ID: 20010397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neck pain assessment in a virtual environment.
    Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):E105-12. PubMed ID: 20110842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: a comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer.
    Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU
    Man Ther; 2008 Oct; 13(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 17681865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated assessment of cervical dystonia.
    Galardi G; Micera S; Carpaneto J; Scolari S; Gambini M; Dario P
    Mov Disord; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1358-67. PubMed ID: 14639682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic measures to objectify head and neck motions in palpatory diagnosis: a pilot study.
    Bush TR; Vorro J
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2008 Feb; 108(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 18303059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fast voluntary neck movements in patients with cervical dystonia: a kinematic study before and after therapy with botulinum toxin type A.
    Gregori B; Agostino R; Bologna M; Dinapoli L; Colosimo C; Accornero N; Berardelli A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 18063411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis.
    Salvia P; Champagne O; Feipel V; Rooze M; de Beyl DZ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 16427167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compensatory head posture and neck problems: is there an association? A cohort study of nystagmus patients.
    Morris B; Smith V; Elphick J; Laws DE
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 18344967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective assessment of cervical dystonia: a pilot study.
    Zetterberg L; Halvorsen K; Färnstrand C; Lundström E; Lindmark B; Aquilonius SM
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2005 Oct; 112(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 16146495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional head kinematics and cervical range of motion in the diagnosis of patients with neck trauma.
    Osterbauer PJ; Long K; Ribaudo TA; Petermann EA; Fuhr AW; Bigos SJ; Yamaguchi GT
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 May; 19(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 8734397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The position of the head in space: a kinematic analysis in patients with cervical dystonia treated with botulinum toxin.
    Albani G; Bulgheroni MV; Mancini F; Mauro A; Fundarò C; Pacchetti C; Sandrini G; Nappi G
    Funct Neurol; 2001; 16(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 11495419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cervical proprioceptive function: optimizing protocols and comparison between tests in normal subjects.
    Swait G; Rushton AB; Miall RC; Newell D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):E692-701. PubMed ID: 18007229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical segmental motion induced by shoulder abduction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Takasaki H; Hall T; Kaneko S; Iizawa T; Ikemoto Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):E122-6. PubMed ID: 19179912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative measurement of cervical range of motion in patients with torticollis treated with botulinum A toxin.
    Dykstra D; Ellingham C; Belfie A; Baxter T; Lee M; Voelker A
    Mov Disord; 1993; 8(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 8419806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system.
    Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU; Postema K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 16096040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test is altered in elderly subjects.
    Uthaikhup S; Jull G
    Man Ther; 2009 Oct; 14(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 19171497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.