These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15288529)
1. Research needs to improve risk assessment of fiber toxicity. Greim HA Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 553(1-2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15288529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective. Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity. Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E; Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal. O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment of dietary exposures to compounds that are genotoxic and carcinogenic--an overview. Dybing E; O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Sanner T Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18584977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, part II: contributions of the EUROTOX specialty section for carcinogenesis. Bolt HM; Degen GH Toxicol Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15159528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Gaylor DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds. Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing nonlinearity in the exposure-response relationship for a genotoxic carcinogen: cancer potency estimates for ethylene oxide. Kirman CR; Sweeney LM; Teta MJ; Sielken RL; Valdez-Flores C; Albertini RJ; Gargas ML Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1165-83. PubMed ID: 15563286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH. Greim H; Arand M; Autrup H; Bolt HM; Bridges J; Dybing E; Glomot R; Foa V; Schulte-Hermann R Arch Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 80(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 16411136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies). National Toxicology Program Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MNT and MutaMouse studies to define the in vivo dose response relations of the genotoxicity of EMS and ENU. Gocke E; Ballantyne M; Whitwell J; Müller L Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 19446969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer risk assessment for 1,3-butadiene: data integration opportunities. Preston RJ Chem Biol Interact; 2007 Mar; 166(1-3):150-5. PubMed ID: 16647696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment of peak exposure to genotoxic carcinogens: a pragmatic approach. Bos PM; Baars BJ; van Raaij MT Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15177639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part VI: when salt and sugar and vegetables are positive, how can genotoxicity data serve to inform risk assessment? Pottenger LH; Bus JS; Gollapudi BB Toxicol Sci; 2007 Aug; 98(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 17387098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flavonoids and alkenylbenzenes: mechanisms of mutagenic action and carcinogenic risk. Rietjens IM; Boersma MG; van der Woude H; Jeurissen SM; Schutte ME; Alink GM Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 574(1-2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15914212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates. Sanner T; Dybing E Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15679476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prevention of cancer and the dose-effect relationship: the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiations]. Tubiana M Cancer Radiother; 2009 Jul; 13(4):238-58. PubMed ID: 19539515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]