218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15288839)
1. An audit of the efficacy of the oral brush biopsy technique in a specialist Oral Medicine unit.
Poate TW; Buchanan JA; Hodgson TA; Speight PM; Barrett AW; Moles DR; Scully C; Porter SR
Oral Oncol; 2004 Sep; 40(8):829-34. PubMed ID: 15288839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.
Mehrotra R; Singh MK; Pandya S; Singh M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18644521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.
Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Carpenter WM; Cohen DM; Bhattacharyya I; Fantasia JE; Lederman DA; Lynch DP; Sciubba JJ; Zunt SL
Gen Dent; 2002; 50(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 12572180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral malignancies associated with negative transepithelial brush biopsy.
Potter TJ; Summerlin DJ; Campbell JH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 61(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 12796875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Usefulness of oral exfoliative cytology for the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma].
Navone R; Marsico A; Reale I; Pich A; Broccoletti R; Pentenero M; Gandolfo S
Minerva Stomatol; 2004 Mar; 53(3):77-86. PubMed ID: 15107778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity and specificity of oral brush biopsy.
Hohlweg-Majert B; Deppe H; Metzger MC; Schumm S; Hoefler H; Kesting MR; Hölzle F; Wolff KD
Cancer Invest; 2009 Mar; 27(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 19160103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.
Bhoopathi V; Kabani S; Mascarenhas AK
Cancer; 2009 Mar; 115(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of toluidine blue staining and brush cytology as adjuncts in clinical examination of suspicious oral mucosal lesions.
Güneri P; Epstein JB; Kaya A; Veral A; Kazandı A; Boyacioglu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 21112183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements.
Pektas ZO; Keskin A; Günhan O; Karslioğlu Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):628-35. PubMed ID: 16546642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral potentially malignant lesions: first-level micro-histological diagnosis from tissue fragments sampled in liquid-based diagnostic cytology.
Navone R; Pentenero M; Rostan I; Burlo P; Marsico A; Broccoletti R; Scully C; Gandolfo S
J Oral Pathol Med; 2008 Jul; 37(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 18298474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [OralCDx brush biopsy--a tool for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma].
Kosicki DM; Riva C; Pajarola GF; Burkhardt A; Grätz KW
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2007; 117(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 17425240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of patients with and without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: is SLNB an accurate and useful procedure?
Santaolalla F; Sanchez JM; Ereno C; Sanchez A; Martinez A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18607913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using cytomorphometry.
Ramaesh T; Mendis BR; Ratnatunga N; Thattil RO
Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Mar; 22(85):23-8. PubMed ID: 11372099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methylation of p16 CpG island associated with malignant progression of oral epithelial dysplasia: a prospective cohort study.
Cao J; Zhou J; Gao Y; Gu L; Meng H; Liu H; Deng D
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Aug; 15(16):5178-83. PubMed ID: 19671846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laminin-5 immunocytochemistry: a new tool for identifying dysplastic cells in oral brush biopsies.
Driemel O; Dahse R; Hakim SG; Tsioutsias T; Pistner H; Reichert TE; Kosmehl H
Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18031447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-computer-assisted liquid-based cytology for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Pérez-Sayáns M; Reboiras-López MD; Gayoso-Diz P; Seijas-Naya F; Antúnez-López JR; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 21526909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expression analysis of extracellular matrix components in brush biopsies of oral lesions.
Driemel O; Kosmehl H; Rosenhahn J; Berndt A; Reichert TE; Zardi L; Dahse R
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(3B):1565-70. PubMed ID: 17595777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective validation of the Martinez-Gimeno clinicopathologic scoring system (MGSS) for evaluating risk of cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Martínez-Gimeno C; Molinero AP; Castro V; Sastre MJ; Castro EE; Aguirre-Jaime A
Head Neck; 2005 Apr; 27(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 15700293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The sensitivity and specificity of the OralCDx technique: evaluation of 103 cases.
Scheifele C; Schmidt-Westhausen AM; Dietrich T; Reichart PA
Oral Oncol; 2004 Sep; 40(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 15288838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relevance of the high positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy.
Eisen D; Frist S
Oral Oncol; 2005 Aug; 41(7):753-5; author reply 756. PubMed ID: 15936979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
