239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15289481)
1. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complex high-resolution linkage disequilibrium and haplotype patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 2.5 Mb of sequence on human chromosome 21.
Olivier M; Bustos VI; Levy MR; Smick GA; Moreno I; Bushard JM; Almendras AA; Sheppard K; Zierten DL; Aggarwal A; Carlson CS; Foster BD; Vo N; Kelly L; Liu X; Cox DR
Genomics; 2001 Nov; 78(1-2):64-72. PubMed ID: 11707074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-wide tagging SNPs with entropy-based Monte Carlo method.
Liu Z; Lin S; Tan M
J Comput Biol; 2006 Nov; 13(9):1606-14. PubMed ID: 17147483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.
Horne BD; Camp NJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 14691953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. htSNPer1.0: software for haplotype block partition and htSNPs selection.
Ding K; Zhang J; Zhou K; Shen Y; Zhang X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():38. PubMed ID: 15740612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis and application of SNP and haplotype in the human genome].
Li J; Pan YC; Li YX; Shi TL
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 32(8):879-89. PubMed ID: 16231744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of haplotype-block definitions on inference of haplotype-block structure and htSNPs selection.
Ding K; Zhou K; Zhang J; Knight J; Zhang X; Shen Y
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):148-59. PubMed ID: 15371531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association studies with SNPbrowser software.
De La Vega FM
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 376():177-93. PubMed ID: 17984546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficient haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection algorithms under various constraints.
Chen WP; Hung CL; Lin YL
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():984014. PubMed ID: 24319694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.
Schulze TG; Zhang K; Chen YS; Akula N; Sun F; McMahon FJ
Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Feb; 13(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 14681300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an algorithm of tagging SNPs selection by linkage disequilibrium.
Tang NL; Pharoah PD; Ma SL; Easton DF
Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 39(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 16427037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Haplotype block structures show significant variation among populations.
Liu N; Sawyer SL; Mukherjee N; Pakstis AJ; Kidd JR; Kidd KK; Brookes AJ; Zhao H
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 15389924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inference of missing SNPs and information quantity measurements for haplotype blocks.
Su SC; Kuo CC; Chen T
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):2001-7. PubMed ID: 15699029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High density linkage disequilibrium mapping using models of haplotype block variation.
Greenspan G; Geiger D
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i137-44. PubMed ID: 15262792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.
Conrad DF; Jakobsson M; Coop G; Wen X; Wall JD; Rosenberg NA; Pritchard JK
Nat Genet; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1251-60. PubMed ID: 17057719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging space.
Ke X; Miretti MM; Broxholme J; Hunt S; Beck S; Bentley DR; Deloukas P; Cardon LR
Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Sep; 14(18):2757-67. PubMed ID: 16103130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A whole genome long-range haplotype (WGLRH) test for detecting imprints of positive selection in human populations.
Zhang C; Bailey DK; Awad T; Liu G; Xing G; Cao M; Valmeekam V; Retief J; Matsuzaki H; Taub M; Seielstad M; Kennedy GC
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(17):2122-8. PubMed ID: 16845142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
