179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15289542)
1. Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection".
Edwards SD
J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 15289542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 'You are inferior!' Revisiting the expressivist argument.
Hofmann B
Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):505-514. PubMed ID: 28614604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.
Boardman FK
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Apr; 107():18-25. PubMed ID: 24602967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
Perez Gomez J
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2020; 30(1):71-109. PubMed ID: 32336693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?
Malek J
J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 20338932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: engaging with the expressivist objection.
Peterson M
J Genet Couns; 2012 Feb; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 22037896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal diagnosis, personal identity, and disability.
Nelson JL
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Sep; 10(3):213-28. PubMed ID: 11658208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
Holm S
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 18156516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Expressivist objections to prenatal screening and testing: Perceptions of people living with disability.
Boardman F; Thomas G
Sociol Health Illn; 2023 Jul; 45(6):1223-1241. PubMed ID: 36181509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A disability critique of the new prenatal test for Down syndrome.
Kaposy C
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Dec; 23(4):299-324. PubMed ID: 24552074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The morality of screening for disability.
McMahan J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():129-32. PubMed ID: 15820024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities.
Kaplan D
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 8403607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The meaning of the act: reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies.
Nelson JL
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Jun; 8(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11655298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expressivism at the beginning and end of life.
Reed P
J Med Ethics; 2020 Aug; 46(8):538-544. PubMed ID: 32611620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations.
Parens E; Asch A
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12587137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whose life is worth preserving? Disabled people and the expressivist objection to neonatology.
Boardman FK
Acta Paediatr; 2021 Feb; 110(2):391-393. PubMed ID: 32359184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasons for providing assisted suicide and the expressivist objection: a response to Donaldson.
Braun E
J Med Ethics; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37968104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disablement and personal identity.
Edwards SD
Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Jun; 10(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 17089206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: a response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick.
Newell C
J Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; 25(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 10226924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.
Gillam L
J Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; 25(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 10226923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
