BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15289591)

  • 41. How should we use information about HWE in the meta-analyses of genetic association studies?
    Minelli C; Thompson JR; Abrams KR; Thakkinstian A; Attia J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 37(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18037675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Meta-analysis to determine the effects of plant disease management measures: review and case studies on soybean and apple.
    Ngugi HK; Esker PD; Scherm H
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 20854109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. PubMed ID: 8817799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects.
    Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
    Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1559-73. PubMed ID: 12111920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Impact of meta-analysis in clinical practice: the example of psychiatry].
    Ceballos C; García-Campayo J; Artal A; Valdizán JR
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2001; 29(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 11602084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of excess statistical significance in meta-analyses of 98 biomarker associations with cancer risk.
    Tsilidis KK; Papatheodorou SI; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1867-78. PubMed ID: 23090067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Meta-analysis as a guide to clinical practice.
    Swales JD
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1993 Dec; 11(5):S59-63. PubMed ID: 8158435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Issues and challenges in coding interventions for meta-analysis of prevention research.
    Devine EC
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():130-46. PubMed ID: 9154255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Difference-based meta-analytic procedures for between-participant and/or within-participant designs: a tutorial review for sports and exercise scientists.
    Ashford D; Davids K; Bennett SJ
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Feb; 27(3):237-55. PubMed ID: 19153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Synthesis of research findings through meta-analysis.
    Mottola CA
    Decubitus; 1992 Sep; 5(5):48-50. PubMed ID: 1418592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.
    Cummings P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jun; 158(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 15184227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The (non)comparability of the correlation effect size across different measurement procedures: a challenge to meta-analysis as a tool for identifying "evidence based practices".
    Nugent WR
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2011 May; 8(3):253-74. PubMed ID: 21660822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Meta-analysis.
    Elliott AT
    Nucl Med Commun; 1994 Apr; 15(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 8072738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Study designs appropriate for the workplace.
    Hogue CJ
    Occup Med; 1986; 1(3):457-72. PubMed ID: 3299789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Meta-analysis: methods, strengths, and weaknesses.
    Buyse M; Piedbois P; Piedbois Y; Carlson RW
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2000 Mar; 14(3):437-43; discussion 444, 447. PubMed ID: 10742969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Meta-analysis. Part 2: Assessing the quality of published meta-analyses.
    Wilson A; Henry DA
    Med J Aust; 1992 Feb; 156(3):173-4, 177-80, 184-7. PubMed ID: 1545719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Meta-analyses of quarks, baryons and mesons--a "Cochrane Collaboration" in particle physics].
    Sauerland S; Sauerland T; Antes G; Barnett RM
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Feb; 96(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 11921612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.