BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15289685)

  • 1. Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur.
    Egol KA; Chang EY; Cvitkovic J; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Aug; 18(7):410-5. PubMed ID: 15289685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical encroachment after cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur: evaluation of a more anatomic radius of curvature.
    Bazylewicz DB; Egol KA; Koval KJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 23287752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.
    Ostrum RF; Marcantonio A; Marburger R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005; 19(10):681-6. PubMed ID: 16314714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical tips of intramedullary nailing in severely bowed femurs in atypical femur fractures: Simulation with 3D printed model.
    Park JH; Lee Y; Shon OJ; Shon HC; Kim JW
    Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1318-24. PubMed ID: 26980645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cadaveric biomechanical study comparing the ease of femoral nail insertion: 1.0- vs 1.5-m bow designs.
    Yuan H; Acklin Y; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Windolf M; Epari D; Schuetz M; Schmutz B
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):663-671. PubMed ID: 28374092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based modeling of sagittal cadaveric femoral bowing and implications for intramedullary nailing.
    Buford WL; Turnbow BJ; Gugala Z; Lindsey RW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Jan; 28(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 24121983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanics of intramedullary nails for femoral fractures.
    Johnson KD; Tencer A
    Unfallchirurg; 1990 Nov; 93(11):506-11. PubMed ID: 2270493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Curvature of the femur and the proximal entry point for an intramedullary rod.
    Harper MC; Carson WL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):155-61. PubMed ID: 3594986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevention of cortical breach during placement of an antegrade intramedullary femoral nail.
    Scolaro JA; Endress C; Mehta S
    Orthopedics; 2013 Sep; 36(9):688-92. PubMed ID: 24024991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison of femoral curves and curves of contemporary intramedullary nails.
    Harma A; Germen B; Karakas HM; Elmali N; Inan M
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Dec; 27(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 16132196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
    Ricci WM; Bellabarba C; Evanoff B; Herscovici D; DiPasquale T; Sanders R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 11265005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrograde femoral nailing: an understanding of the intercondylar insertion site.
    Morgan SJ; Hurley D; Agudelo JF; Meyers T; Lyons R; Parekh A; Smith WR
    J Trauma; 2008 Jan; 64(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 18188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does modern nail geometry affect positioning in the distal femur of elderly patients with hip fractures? A comparison of otherwise identical intramedullary nails with a 200 versus 150 cm radius of curvature.
    Collinge CA; Beltran CP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):299-302. PubMed ID: 23287751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of locked distal screws in retrograde nailing of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a laboratory study using cadaver femurs.
    Tejwani NC; Park S; Iesaka K; Kummer F
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Jul; 19(6):380-3. PubMed ID: 16003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of human femoral geometry and its implications on nail design.
    Arnone JC; Crist BD; Ward CV; El-Gizawy AS; Pashuck T; Della Rocca GJ
    Injury; 2021 Jan; 52(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 32958339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraction force, energy and nail deformation for 1.5 m versus 1.0 m intramedullary femoral nail bow design: A biomechanical investigation.
    Yuan H; Schmutz B; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Zderic I; Windolf M; Acklin Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Mar; 103():105906. PubMed ID: 36806999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trochanteric Entry for Femoral Lengthening Nails in Children: Is It Safe?
    Hammouda AI; Jauregui JJ; Gesheff MG; Standard SC; Herzenberg JE
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Jun; 37(4):258-264. PubMed ID: 28481811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a Retrograde Guidewire to Direct an Antegrade Femoral Nail.
    Pawlak AC; Malik AN; Berliner Z; Kottmeier SA
    Orthopedics; 2023; 46(2):e132-e135. PubMed ID: 36343632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional morphologic features of Asian atypical femur and clinical implications of cephalomedullary nail fixation: Computational measurement at actual size.
    Lee KJ; Kim BS; Kim KT; Jung GH
    Injury; 2022 Dec; 53(12):4090-4098. PubMed ID: 36207153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interest in curves: when the radius of curvature matters in femur fractures. A CT based morphometric study.
    Mittal S; Kabra A; Trikha T; Karpe A; Kumar A; Mukherjee K; Trikha V
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Aug; 33(6):2261-2270. PubMed ID: 36282333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.