174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1529017)
1. Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet.
Looy H; Weingarten HP
Physiol Behav; 1992 Jul; 52(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1529017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet.
Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
Physiol Behav; 1997 Sep; 62(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 9272678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli.
Looy H; Callaghan S; Weingarten HP
Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 1523245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensory responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) or sucrose solutions and food preferences in young women.
Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():797-801. PubMed ID: 9929687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes.
Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB
Chem Senses; 1997 Feb; 22(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9056083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propylthiouracil (PROP)--a tool to determine taster status in relation to caries experience, streptococcus mutans levels and dietary preferences in children.
Verma P; Shetty V; Hegde AM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 17315806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures.
Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Barratt-Fornell A
Physiol Behav; 1998 Mar; 63(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 9617998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n propylthiouracil: a new risk determinant for dental caries in children.
Rupesh S; Nayak UA
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Jun; 24(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16823229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PROP (6-n-Propylthiouracil) tasting and sensory responses to caffeine,sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and chocolate.
Ly A; Drewnowski A
Chem Senses; 2001 Jan; 26(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11124214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying and Characterizing Subpopulations of Heavy Alcohol Drinkers Via a Sucrose Preference Test: A Sweet Road to a Better Phenotypic Characterization?
Bouhlal S; Farokhnia M; Lee MR; Akhlaghi F; Leggio L
Alcohol Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 53(5):560-569. PubMed ID: 30016385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults.
Garneau NL; Nuessle TM; Mendelsberg BJ; Shepard S; Tucker RM
Food Qual Prefer; 2018 Apr; 65():175-180. PubMed ID: 31320785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.
Weafer J; Lyon N; Hedeker D; de Wit H
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Nov; 234(21):3185-3194. PubMed ID: 28762072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Sladekova M; Yeomans MR
Int J Obes (Lond); 2024 Jun; 48(6):764-777. PubMed ID: 38467727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PROP test: prediction of caries risk by genetic taste perception among the visually impaired children.
Shetty V; B L P; Hegde AM
Spec Care Dentist; 2014; 34(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 24382369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of biological, experiential and psychological factors in wine preference segmentation.
Pickering GJ; Hayes JE
Aust J Grape Wine Res; 2017 Jun; 23(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 28579910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychophysical measurement of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste perception.
Lucchina LA; Curtis OF; Putnam P; Drewnowski A; Prutkin JM; Bartoshuk LM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():816-9. PubMed ID: 9929692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
