These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1529017)

  • 1. Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet.
    Looy H; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Jul; 52(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1529017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
    Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Sep; 62(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 9272678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
    Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli.
    Looy H; Callaghan S; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 1523245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) or sucrose solutions and food preferences in young women.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():797-801. PubMed ID: 9929687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB
    Chem Senses; 1997 Feb; 22(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9056083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
    Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propylthiouracil (PROP)--a tool to determine taster status in relation to caries experience, streptococcus mutans levels and dietary preferences in children.
    Verma P; Shetty V; Hegde AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 17315806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Barratt-Fornell A
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Mar; 63(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 9617998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n propylthiouracil: a new risk determinant for dental caries in children.
    Rupesh S; Nayak UA
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Jun; 24(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16823229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PROP (6-n-Propylthiouracil) tasting and sensory responses to caffeine,sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and chocolate.
    Ly A; Drewnowski A
    Chem Senses; 2001 Jan; 26(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11124214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying and Characterizing Subpopulations of Heavy Alcohol Drinkers Via a Sucrose Preference Test: A Sweet Road to a Better Phenotypic Characterization?
    Bouhlal S; Farokhnia M; Lee MR; Akhlaghi F; Leggio L
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 53(5):560-569. PubMed ID: 30016385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults.
    Garneau NL; Nuessle TM; Mendelsberg BJ; Shepard S; Tucker RM
    Food Qual Prefer; 2018 Apr; 65():175-180. PubMed ID: 31320785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.
    Weafer J; Lyon N; Hedeker D; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Nov; 234(21):3185-3194. PubMed ID: 28762072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Sladekova M; Yeomans MR
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2024 Jun; 48(6):764-777. PubMed ID: 38467727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PROP test: prediction of caries risk by genetic taste perception among the visually impaired children.
    Shetty V; B L P; Hegde AM
    Spec Care Dentist; 2014; 34(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 24382369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
    Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of biological, experiential and psychological factors in wine preference segmentation.
    Pickering GJ; Hayes JE
    Aust J Grape Wine Res; 2017 Jun; 23(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 28579910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysical measurement of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste perception.
    Lucchina LA; Curtis OF; Putnam P; Drewnowski A; Prutkin JM; Bartoshuk LM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():816-9. PubMed ID: 9929692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.