These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15291273)

  • 21. Do Personality Factors Assessed Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Hearing-Related Quality Of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deafened Adults?
    Muigg F; Bliem HR; Holzner B; Kühn H; Zorowka PG; Weichbold VW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):418-425. PubMed ID: 29939862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The impact of cochlear implant (CI) on the process of phonation and quality of life of patients with pre- and postlingual deafness].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Moskal D
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2012 Aug; 33(194):70-9. PubMed ID: 23009003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A pilot study to explore the experiences of congenitally or early profoundly deafened candidates who receive cochlear implants as adults.
    Jeffs E; Redfern K; Stanfield C; Starczewski H; Stone S; Twomey T; Fortnum H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):312-20. PubMed ID: 25985089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Personal, social, and family adjustment in school-aged children with a cochlear implant.
    Nicholas JG; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):69S-81S. PubMed ID: 12612482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints.
    Zhao F; Bai Z; Stephens D
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 33(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 18983375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-use of cochlear implants by post-lingually deafened adults.
    Summerfield AQ; Marshall DH
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2000 Mar; 1(1):18-38. PubMed ID: 18791991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. UCH/RNID single channel extracochlear implant: results in thirty profoundly deafened adults.
    Cooper HR; Carpenter L; Aleksy W; Booth CL; Read TE; Graham JM; Fraser JG
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 18():22-38. PubMed ID: 2607192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.
    Leigh JR; Moran M; Hollow R; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S3-8. PubMed ID: 26963131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Emotional response to music by postlingually-deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):879-81. PubMed ID: 23285951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parents' views on the quality of life of their children 2-3 years after cochlear implantation.
    Huttunen K; Rimmanen S; Vikman S; Virokannas N; Sorri M; Archbold S; Lutman ME
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1786-94. PubMed ID: 19875180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life.
    Faber CE; Grøntved AM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2000; 543():151-3. PubMed ID: 10909006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear implants in adults over 60: a study of communicative benefits and the impact on quality of life.
    Ramos A; Guerra-Jiménez G; Rodriguez C; Borkoski S; Falcón JC; Perez D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 23510755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developing an assessment approach for perceptual changes to tinnitus sound characteristics for adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Greenberg D; Meerton L; Graham J; Vickers D
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):392-404. PubMed ID: 27146518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly.
    Vermeire K; Brokx JP; Wuyts FL; Cochet E; Hofkens A; Van de Heyning PH
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 15793403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life.
    Sparreboom M; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 138(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22248561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.
    Geers A; Brenner C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):2S-14S. PubMed ID: 12612476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.