616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15291826)
1. Allergic and non-allergic periorbital dermatitis: patch test results of the Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology during a 5-year period.
Herbst RA; Uter W; Pirker C; Geier J; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15291826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periorbital dermatitis--a recalcitrant disease: causes and differential diagnoses.
Feser A; Plaza T; Vogelgsang L; Mahler V
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(4):858-63. PubMed ID: 18721191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periorbital contact sensitization.
Landeck L; Schalock PC; Baden LA; Gonzalez E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 150(3):366-370.e2. PubMed ID: 20541737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sesquiterpene lactone mix patch testing supplemented with dandelion extract in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis and non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Mimica-Dukić N; Boza P; Vujanović Lj; Duran V; Stojanović S
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 15479198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Periorbital dermatitis in 4779 patients - patch test results during a 10-year period.
Landeck L; John SM; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Apr; 70(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 24325408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy in patients with periorbital eczema: an analysis of allergens. Data recorded by the Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology.
Ockenfels HM; Seemann U; Goos M
Dermatology; 1997; 195(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9310716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results of patch test in hairdressers examined in the institute of occupational medicine in Łódź].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Chomiczewska D
Med Pr; 2009; 60(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 20187494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rosacea and contact allergy to cosmetics and topical medicaments--retrospective analysis of multicentre surveillance data 1995-2002.
Jappe U; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Feb; 52(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 15725288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Heine G; Schnuch A; Uter W; Worm M
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 15479199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries--results of the IVDK*, 1998-2002.
Uter W; Balzer C; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Schnuch A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 16191021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
