These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15292686)

  • 1. Measuring blood pressure in stable renal transplant recipients: what you measure depends on what you use.
    Afzali B; Haydar AA; Abbs IC; Goldsmith DJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2004; 97(3):c98-102. PubMed ID: 15292686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
    Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of two automatic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2009 guidelines: the Omron BP765 (HEM-7311-ZSA) and the Omron BP760N (HEM-7320-Z).
    Takahashi H; Yoshika M; Yokoi T
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2015; 11():49-53. PubMed ID: 25657587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
    Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of home blood pressure-monitoring devices, Omron HEM-1020 and Omron i-Q132 (HEM-1010-E), according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
    Takahashi H; Yoshika M; Yokoi T
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Aug; 16(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 21701384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field testing in Suriname of two blood pressure-measuring devices for low-resource and middle-resource countries, according to a WHO protocol.
    Kewalbansing PV; Ishwardat AR; Brewster LM; Oehlers G; van Montfrans GA
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 23412397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements.
    Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.