210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15293061)
1. The "strip" patch test: results of a multicentre study towards a standardization.
Dickel H; Bruckner TM; Erdmann SM; Fluhr JW; Frosch PJ; Grabbe J; Löffler H; Merk HF; Pirker C; Schwanitz HJ; Weisshaar E; Brasch J
Arch Dermatol Res; 2004 Oct; 296(5):212-9. PubMed ID: 15293061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.
Dickel H; Kreft B; Kuss O; Worm M; Soost S; Brasch J; Pfützner W; Grabbe J; Angelova-Fischer I; Elsner P; Fluhr J; Altmeyer P; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 May; 62(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 20536477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stratum corneum integrity as a predictor for peristomal skin problems in ostomates.
Nybaek H; Lophagen S; Karlsmark T; Bang Knudsen D; Jemec GB
Br J Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 162(2):357-61. PubMed ID: 19811497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.
Koopman DG; Kezić S; Verberk MM
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15030332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "New" techniques for more sensitive patch testing?
Dickel H; Altmeyer P; Brasch J
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2011 Nov; 9(11):889-96. PubMed ID: 21535406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The tape stripping procedure--evaluation of some critical parameters.
Lademann J; Jacobi U; Surber C; Weigmann HJ; Fluhr JW
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2009 Jun; 72(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18775778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized tape stripping: a practical and reproducible protocol to uniformly reduce the stratum corneum.
Dickel H; Goulioumis A; Gambichler T; Fluhr JW; Kamphowe J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2010; 23(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 20484967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of RNA recovery and gene expression in the epidermis using non-invasive tape stripping.
Wong R; Tran V; Talwalker S; Benson NR
J Dermatol Sci; 2006 Nov; 44(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 17014996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytokines at different stratum corneum levels in normal and sodium lauryl sulphate-irritated skin.
de Jongh CM; Verberk MM; Spiekstra SW; Gibbs S; Kezic S
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Nov; 13(4):390-8. PubMed ID: 17908190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of the relative stratum corneum amount removed by tape stripping.
Jacobi U; Weigmann HJ; Ulrich J; Sterry W; Lademann J
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15807805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
