270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15293119)
1. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 16644232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.
Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite Element Evaluation of Different Osteosynthesis Variations That Used After Segmental Mandibular Resection.
Şanal KO; Özden B; Baş B
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 27893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.
Markwardt J; Pfeifer G; Eckelt U; Reitemeier B
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement.
Hoefert S; Taier R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 29567342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel hybrid reconstruction plate for mandible segmental defects: A finite element analysis and fatigue testing.
Wu CH; Lin YS; Liu YS; Lin CL
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1671-1680. PubMed ID: 28838835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.
Chang YW; Liu PH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3167-70. PubMed ID: 24110400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of biplanar customized reconstruction plates for lateral and central segmental defects of mandible.
Demir E; Yalçın G; Kalaycı A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 36920278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carbon plate shows even distribution of stress, decreases screw loosening, and increases recovery of preoperative daily feed intake amount in a rabbit model of mandibular continuity defects.
Lee SW; György S; Choi JB; Choi JY; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24135001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D-FEM and histomorphology of mandibular reconstruction with the titanium functionally dynamic bridging plate.
Schuller-Götzburg P; Pleschberger M; Rammerstorfer FG; Krenkel C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1298-305. PubMed ID: 19828292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Notch sensitivity jeopardizes titanium locking plate fatigue strength.
Tseng WJ; Chao CK; Wang CC; Lin J
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2726-2732. PubMed ID: 27717540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy.
Narra N; Valášek J; Hannula M; Marcián P; Sándor GK; Hyttinen J; Wolff J
J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):264-8. PubMed ID: 24290177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Topology optimization of a mandibular reconstruction plate and biomechanical validation.
Koper DC; Leung CAW; Smeets LCP; Laeven PFJ; Tuijthof GJM; Kessler PAWH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104157. PubMed ID: 33187871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]