104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15293974)
1. Comparison of calculated and direct low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in a routine laboratory.
Amayo AA; Kirera S
East Afr Med J; 2004 Mar; 81(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15293974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.
Anwar M; Khan DA; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jan; 24(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24411534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison common equations for LDL-C calculation with direct assay and developing a novel formula in Iranian children and adolescents: the CASPIAN V study.
Molavi F; Namazi N; Asadi M; Sanjari M; Motlagh ME; Shafiee G; Qorbani M; Heshmat R; Kelishadi R
Lipids Health Dis; 2020 Jun; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 32505199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels < or =4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation.
Tighe DA; Ockene IS; Reed G; Nicolosi R
Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Mar; 365(1-2):236-42. PubMed ID: 16259972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct method for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with chronic renal disease: a comparative assessment.
Akanji AO
Nephron; 1998; 79(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 9647494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations between Direct and Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Measurements in Children and Adolescents.
Alouffi S; Khan MWA; Alotabi N; Alsuggyair A; Alhassan I; Al Alwan I; Al Banyan E; Al-Twaijri YA; Tamim H; Al-Hussein F; Aljasser S; Alfwaz H; Tamimi W
J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Jun; 34(6):e23236. PubMed ID: 32125729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by the Friedewald equation is adequate for classifying patients on the basis of nationally recommended cutpoints.
Warnick GR; Knopp RH; Fitzpatrick V; Branson L
Clin Chem; 1990 Jan; 36(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2297909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of assessment techniques: plasma lipid and lipoproteins related to the metabolic syndrome.
Davy BM; Davy KP
Lipids Health Dis; 2006 Jan; 5():3. PubMed ID: 16448573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in a sub-Saharan African population.
Choukem SP; Manases T; Nda-Mefoo JP; Dimala CA; Mboue-Djieka Y; Sobngwi E; Kengne AP
Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():25-30. PubMed ID: 29273329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol can be chemically measured: a new superior method.
Okada M; Matsui H; Ito Y; Fujiwara A; Inano K
J Lab Clin Med; 1998 Sep; 132(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 9735925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method.
Whelton SP; Meeusen JW; Donato LJ; Jaffe AS; Saenger A; Sokoll LJ; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
J Clin Lipidol; 2017; 11(4):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 28826567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Multicenter evaluation of four homogenous LDL-cholesterol assays].
Bayer P; Veinberg F; Couderc R; Cherfils C; Cambillau M; Cosson C; Fradin S; Gillery P; Steinmetz J; Legrand A; Egloff M; Beucler I
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 15689310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Homogeneous Assays for LDL-C and HDL-C are Reliable in Both the Postprandial and Fasting State.
Miida T; Nishimura K; Hirayama S; Miyamoto Y; Nakamura M; Masuda D; Yamashita S; Ushiyama M; Komori T; Fujita N; Yokoyama S; Teramoto T
J Atheroscler Thromb; 2017 Jun; 24(6):583-599. PubMed ID: 28321014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical and clinical evaluation of two homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol in hyperlipidemic patients.
Esteban-Salán M; Guimón-Bardesi A; de La Viuda-Unzueta JM; Azcarate-Ania MN; Pascual-Usandizaga P; Amoroto-Del-Río E
Clin Chem; 2000 Aug; 46(8 Pt 1):1121-31. PubMed ID: 10926892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How should low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration be determined?
Faas FH; Earleywine A; Smith G; Simmons DL
J Fam Pract; 2002 Nov; 51(11):972-5. PubMed ID: 12485554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.
Yu HH; Markowitz R; De Ferranti SD; Neufeld EJ; Farrow G; Bernstein HH; Rifai N
Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10751585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical comparison of calculated versus direct measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level.
Lindsey CC; Graham MR; Johnston TP; Kiroff CG; Freshley A
Pharmacotherapy; 2004 Feb; 24(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 14998216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population.
Harris N; Neufeld EJ; Newburger JW; Ticho B; Baker A; Ginsburg GS; Rimm E; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 1996 Aug; 42(8 Pt 1):1182-8. PubMed ID: 8697574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
