These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15294212)

  • 1. Dipole localization accuracy using grand-average EEG data sets.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Dick B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2108-12. PubMed ID: 15294212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The coupled dipole model: an integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets.
    Bijma F; de Munck JC; Böcker KB; Huizenga HM; Heethaar RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):890-904. PubMed ID: 15528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency domain dipole localization: extensions of the method and applications to auditory and visual evoked potentials.
    Raz J; Biggins CA; Turetsky B; Fein G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Sep; 40(9):909-18. PubMed ID: 8288282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of localizing equivalent dipoles and the spatio-temporal correlations of background EEG.
    Yamazaki T; Van Dijk BW; Spekreijse H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1114-21. PubMed ID: 9735561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inverse modeling on decomposed electroencephalographic data: a way forward?
    Lelic D; Gratkowski M; Valeriani M; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 26(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19584750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.
    Plummer C; Litewka L; Farish S; Harvey AS; Cook MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 118(11):2344-61. PubMed ID: 17889598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-way matrix analysis, the MUSIC algorithm and the coupled dipole model.
    de Munck JC; Bijma F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 183(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 19591868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dipole localization using simulated intracerebral EEG.
    Chang N; Gulrajani R; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2707-16. PubMed ID: 16214401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.
    Scarff CJ; Reynolds A; Goodyear BG; Ponton CW; Dort JC; Eggermont JJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):1129-42. PubMed ID: 15528112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of two dipolar inverse algorithms applying reciprocity for forward calculation.
    Laarne P; Hyttinen J; Dodel S; Malmivuo J; Eskola H
    Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Jun; 33(3):172-85. PubMed ID: 10860584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in areas of human frontal medial wall activated by left and right motor execution: dipole-tracing analysis of grand-averaged potentials incorporated with MNI three-layer head model.
    Inoue M; Masaoka Y; Kawamura M; Okamoto Y; Homma I
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 18440140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.