These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15295321)

  • 21. Dimensional accuracy analysis of implant framework castings from 2 casting systems.
    Chang TL; Maruyama C; White SN; Son S; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 16274145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of laser-welding and electroerosion on passive fit of implant-supported prosthesis.
    Silva TB; De Arruda Nobilo MA; Pessanha Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Guimaraes MB
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 19001843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium.
    Sadeq A; Cai Z; Woody RD; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 12869969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
    Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vertical microgap and passivity of fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques.
    Berejuk HM; Shimizu RH; de Mattias Sartori IA; Valgas L; Tiossi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1064-70. PubMed ID: 25216131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
    Ortorp A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Customized Abutments Made from Titanium and a Machinable Precious Alloy.
    Lee JH; Park JM; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 26800166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication.
    Romero GG; Engelmeier R; Powers JM; Canterbury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Dec; 84(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 11125345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the adaptation interface of one-piece implant-supported superstructures obtained in Ni-Cr-Ti and Pd-Ag alloys.
    Costa HM; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 15057397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature.
    Tao J; Yoda M; Kimura K; Okuno O
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 16038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Mischitz I; Larsson C; Janda M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 35981927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.