These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15295326)
1. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. Usumez A; Cobankara FK; Ozturk N; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 15295326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. Akkayan B J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 15295325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of teeth restored with different adhesive dowel systems: an in vitro study. Sarı T; Özyesil AG J Prosthodont; 2014 Jan; 23(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 23724962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts. Başaran EG; Ayna E; Halifeoğlu M J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):239-51. PubMed ID: 22475467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation. Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Kohli S J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 22339985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin dowel diameter on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Tey KC; Lui JL J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):572-81. PubMed ID: 24750324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system. Amin RA; Mandour MH; Abd El-Ghany OS J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):484-94. PubMed ID: 24495157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sealing ability of three fiber dowel systems. Santos V; Perdigão J; Gomes G; Silva AL J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):566-76. PubMed ID: 19515165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Erkut S; Gulsahi K; Caglar A; Imirzalioglu P; Karbhari VM; Ozmen I Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 18335739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in endodontically-treated teeth restored with posts. Ravanshad S; Ghoreeshi N Aust Endod J; 2003 Dec; 29(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 14700397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth. Al-harbi F; Nathanson D J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 14668755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of thermomechanical aging on bond strength and interface morphology of glass fiber and zirconia posts bonded with a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhesive resin cement to natural teeth. Yaman BC; Ozer F; Takeichi T; Karabucak B; Koray F; Blatz MB J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 24680355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Apical Root Canal Perforation Size on Push-out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Dowels. BinMahfooz AM; Sindi MA; Alsohaibi TH; Jabbad HH; Johar AO J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 May; 21(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 32690833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of endodontic sealers on dowels luted with resin cement. Burns DR; Moon PC; Webster NP; Burns DA J Prosthodont; 2000 Sep; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 11179464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the retention of three endodontic dowel systems following different surface treatments. Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Kelsey MR J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 18086142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems. Goto Y; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Junge T J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]