These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15295944)

  • 1. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
    Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
    J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients.
    Rokni S; Todescan R; Watson P; Pharoah M; Adegbembo AO; Deporter D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15747676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot study to assess the performance of a partially threaded sintered porous-surfaced dental implant in the dog mandible.
    Shimada E; Pilliar RM; Deporter DA; Schroering R; Atenafu E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):948-54. PubMed ID: 18271376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of threaded versus sintered porous-surfaced dental implants using open window or indirect osteotome-mediated sinus elevation: a retrospective report.
    Kermalli JY; Deporter DA; Lai JY; Lam E; Atenafu E
    J Periodontol; 2008 Apr; 79(4):728-36. PubMed ID: 18380568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of sintered, porous-surfaced, press-fit implants after 10 years of function in the partially edentulous posterior mandible.
    Deporter DA; Kermalli J; Todescan R; Atenafu E
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct; 32(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 22754904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth.
    Deporter D; Ogiso B; Sohn DS; Ruljancich K; Pharoah M
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1280-6. PubMed ID: 18597612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implant design and optimal treatment outcomes.
    Deporter D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Dec; 29(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 20072740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.
    Renouard F; Nisand D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():35-51. PubMed ID: 16968380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short threaded implants with an oxidized surface to restore posterior teeth: 1- to 3-year results of a prospective study.
    De Santis D; Cucchi A; Longhi C; Vincenzo B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 21483893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluations of a porous-surfaced endosseous implant system.
    Heller AL; Heller RL
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):240-6. PubMed ID: 9524502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
    Lambert FE; Weber HP; Susarla SM; Belser UC; Gallucci GO
    J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1220-30. PubMed ID: 19656021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short porous implants in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year report of a prospective study.
    Corrente G; Abundo R; des Ambrois AB; Savio L; Perelli M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Feb; 29(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19244879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study.
    Misch CE; Steignga J; Barboza E; Misch-Dietsh F; Cianciola LJ; Kazor C
    J Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 77(8):1340-7. PubMed ID: 16937587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year treatment outcomes with four types of implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible in partially edentulous patients: a retrospective study.
    Ozkan Y; Akoğlu B; Kulak-Ozkan Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 21691612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.