These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15295969)

  • 1. Spectral estimation for characterization of acoustic aberration.
    Varslot T; Angelsen B; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 15295969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eigenfunction analysis of stochastic backscatter for characterization of acoustic aberration in medical ultrasound imaging.
    Varslot T; Krogstad H; Mo E; Angelsen BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3068-76. PubMed ID: 15237831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical estimation of ultrasonic propagation path parameters for aberration correction.
    Waag RC; Astheimer JP
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 May; 52(5):851-69. PubMed ID: 16048187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of ultrasound wave aberration with signals from random scatterers.
    Måsøy SE; Angelsen B; Varslot T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):2998-3009. PubMed ID: 15237824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors in ultrasonic scatterer size estimates due to phase and amplitude aberration.
    Gerig A; Zagzebski J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3244-52. PubMed ID: 15237849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of anisotropic myocardial backscatter using spectral slope, intercept and midband fit parameters.
    Yang M; Krueger TM; Miller JG; Holland MR
    Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Apr; 29(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 17679326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of tissue microstructure using ultrasonic backscatter: theory and technique for optimization using a Gaussian form factor.
    Oelze ML; Zachary JF; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1202-11. PubMed ID: 12243165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-shift estimation and focusing through distributed aberration using multirow arrays.
    Lacefield JC; Waag RC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Nov; 48(6):1606-24. PubMed ID: 11800123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
    Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A proposed microscopic elastic wave theory for ultrasonic backscatter from myocardial tissue.
    Rose JH; Kaufmann MR; Wickline SA; Hall CS; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):656-68. PubMed ID: 7860840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo ultrasonic attenuation in cetacean soft tissues.
    Gray MD; Rogers PH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL83. PubMed ID: 28253670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial coherence of backscatter for the nonlinearly produced second harmonic for specific transmit apodizations.
    Fedewa RJ; Wallace KD; Holland MR; Jago JR; Ng GC; Rielly MR; Robinson BS; Miller JG
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 15217235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A heterogeneous nonlinear attenuating full-wave model of ultrasound.
    Pinton GF; Dahl J; Rosenzweig S; Trahey GE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 19411208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
    Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new transducer receive transfer function calibration method: application to microbubble backscattering cross-section measurements at high frequency.
    Sprague MR; Chérin E; Foster FS
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1159-68. PubMed ID: 21693398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the precision of spectral backscatter measurements on the estimation of scatterers size in cancellous bone.
    Padilla F; Jenson F; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e57-60. PubMed ID: 16904147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction of ultrasonic wave aberration with a time delay and amplitude filter.
    Måsøy SE; Johansen TF; Angelsen B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2009-20. PubMed ID: 12703712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.