These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. Ewert SD; Verhey JL; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2921-31. PubMed ID: 12509013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination. Buss E; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 19894827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains. Nelson PC; Ewert SD; Carney LH; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2168-81. PubMed ID: 17471731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a noise modulation masker on the detection of second-order amplitude modulation. Millman RE; Green GG; Lorenzi C; Rees A Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 178(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 12684172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators. Verhey JL; Ewert SD; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2135-46. PubMed ID: 14587611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners. Chatterjee M; Oba SI J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of masker envelope irregularities on tone detection in narrowband and broadband noise maskers. Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):73-81. PubMed ID: 23117057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal detection in temporally modulated and spectrally shaped maskers. van den Brink WA; Houtgast T; Smoorenburg GF J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):267-78. PubMed ID: 1737877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences. Thompson ER; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1017-29. PubMed ID: 18247904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of modulation coherence on signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands. Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 2212294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm. Klink KB; Dierker H; Beutelmann R; Klump GM J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19763691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of modulation maskers on the detection of second-order amplitude modulation with and without notched noise. Uchanski RM; Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2937-46. PubMed ID: 16708951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise. Neff DL; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2289-98. PubMed ID: 8865636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release. Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 19894826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]