These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296019)

  • 1. Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: calibration measurements and phantom experiments.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):594-602. PubMed ID: 15296019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: theoretical approximations and simulation analysis.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):578-93. PubMed ID: 15296018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of local attenuation approximations when estimating correlation length from backscattered ultrasound echoes.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):546-53. PubMed ID: 16875251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms.
    Bigelow TA; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1431-9. PubMed ID: 15807030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistics of ultrasonic scatterer size estimation with a reference phantom.
    Gerig A; Zagzebski J; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3430-7. PubMed ID: 12822813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of a bistatic scattering substitution technique for calibration of focused receivers.
    Rich KT; Mast TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):EL469-73. PubMed ID: 26627816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of transducer characteristics on the estimation of Nakagami paramater as a function of scatterer concentration.
    Tsui PH; Wang SH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1345-53. PubMed ID: 15582234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions.
    Lavarello R; Oelze M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):744-53. PubMed ID: 21507752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Franceschini E; Guillermin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3735-47. PubMed ID: 23231104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression.
    Kanzler SG; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4599-607. PubMed ID: 18537407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scatterer size estimation using the center frequency assessed from ultrasound time domain data.
    Erlöv T; Jansson T; Persson HW; Cinthio M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2352. PubMed ID: 27794324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective scatterer diameter estimates for broad scatterer size distributions.
    Nordberg EP; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 24831300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using backscattered echoes from multiple sources.
    Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1367-73. PubMed ID: 18681622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors in ultrasonic scatterer size estimates due to phase and amplitude aberration.
    Gerig A; Zagzebski J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3244-52. PubMed ID: 15237849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial Angular Compounding Technique for H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging.
    Khairalseed M; Xiong F; Kim JW; Mattrey RF; Parker KJ; Hoyt K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 44(1):267-277. PubMed ID: 29031985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal processing strategies that improve performance and understanding of the quantitative ultrasound SPECTRAL FIT algorithm.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1808-19. PubMed ID: 16240839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.