These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296443)

  • 1. Toward a robust model of packing and scale-up for chromatographic beds. 2. Flow packing.
    Keener RN; Maneval JE; Fernandez EJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2004; 20(4):1159-68. PubMed ID: 15296443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a robust model of packing and scale-up for chromatographic beds. 1. Mechanical compression.
    Keener RN; Maneval JE; Fernandez EJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2004; 20(4):1146-58. PubMed ID: 15296442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a two-dimensional model for predicting the pressure-flow and compression properties during column packing scale-up.
    McCue JT; Cecchini D; Chu C; Liu WH; Spann A
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Mar; 1145(1-2):89-101. PubMed ID: 17258755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancement in the modeling of pressure-flow for the guidance of development and scale-up of commercial-scale biopharmaceutical chromatography.
    Keener RN; Fernandez EJ; Maneval JE; Hart RA
    J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1190(1-2):127-40. PubMed ID: 18374935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical deformation of compressible chromatographic columns.
    Keener RN; Maneval JE; Ostergren KC; Fernandez EJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 12052077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrodynamic impact of particle shape in slurry packed liquid chromatography columns.
    Lottes F; Arlt W; Minceva M; Stenby EH
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jul; 1216(30):5687-95. PubMed ID: 19524930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for the prediction of scale-up when using compressible chromatographic packings.
    Tran R; Joseph JR; Sinclair A; Bracewell D; Zhou Y; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2007; 23(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 17302429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilisation of controlled pore topology for the separation of bioparticles in a mixed-glass beads column.
    Mota M; Teixeira J; Yelshin A; Cortez S
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2006 Oct; 843(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16815763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cored anion-exchange chromatography media for antibody flow-through purification.
    Wang C; Soice NP; Ramaswamy S; Gagnon BA; Umana J; Cotoni KA; Bian N; Cheng KS
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jun; 1155(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 17477929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Packing of large-scale chromatography columns with irregularly shaped glass based resins using a stop-flow method.
    Siu SC; Chia C; Mok Y; Pattnaik P
    Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(6):1319-25. PubMed ID: 25080096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure-Flow experiments, packing, and modeling for scale-up of a mixed mode chromatography column for biopharmaceutical manufacturing.
    Prentice J; Evans ST; Robbins D; Ferreira G
    J Chromatogr A; 2020 Aug; 1625():461117. PubMed ID: 32709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of mechanical properties of insulin crystals by atomic force microscopy.
    Guo S; Akhremitchev BB
    Langmuir; 2008 Feb; 24(3):880-7. PubMed ID: 18163652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrodynamic chromatography for the size classification of micron and sub-micron sized packing materials.
    Thompson JW; Lieberman RA; Jorgenson JW
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Nov; 1216(45):7732-8. PubMed ID: 19767005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavior of packing materials in axially compressed chromatographic columns.
    Cherrak DE; Al-Bokari M; Drumm EC; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2002 Jan; 943(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 11820276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are axial and radial flow chromatography different?
    Besselink T; van der Padt A; Janssen AE; Boom RM
    J Chromatogr A; 2013 Jan; 1271(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 23228917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of general rate model with a new model--artificial neural network model in describing chromatographic kinetics of solanesol adsorption in packed column by macroporous resins.
    Du X; Yuan Q; Zhao J; Li Y
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Mar; 1145(1-2):165-74. PubMed ID: 17289066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the removal of dissolved organic carbon by ion exchange in a completely mixed flow reactor.
    Boyer TH; Miller CT; Singer PC
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):1897-906. PubMed ID: 18082241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the effects of column packing quality and residence time changes on protein monomer/aggregate separation.
    McCue JT; Engel P; Thömmes J
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jun; 1216(24):4895-901. PubMed ID: 19419721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation of the dynamic packing behavior of preparative chromatography columns via discrete particle modeling.
    Dorn M; Hekmat D
    Biotechnol Prog; 2016 Mar; 32(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 26588806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does column packing microstructure affect column efficiency in liquid chromatography?
    Schure MR; Maier RS
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Sep; 1126(1-2):58-69. PubMed ID: 16806247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.