These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296464)

  • 61. Effects of feeding strategies on the performance of an anaerobic discontinuous reactor containing immobilized biomass with circulation system for liquid-phase mixing.
    Orra AA; Ratusznei SM; Rodrigues JA; Foresti E; Zaiat M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):303-10. PubMed ID: 15303755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A multiagent evolutionary algorithm for combinatorial optimization problems.
    Liu J; Zhong W; Jiao L
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Feb; 40(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 19643707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR).
    Mohan SV; Rao NC; Sarma PN
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 144(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 17097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effect of experimental error on the efficiency of different optimization methods for bioprocess media optimization.
    Milavec P; Podgornik A; Stravs R; Koloini T
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2002 Jun; 25(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 14505006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Simultaneous Optimization of Feeding Rate and Operation Parameters for Fed-Batch Fermentation Processes.
    Wang FS; Cheng WM
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999 Oct; 15(5):949-952. PubMed ID: 10514267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Bioprocess optimization under uncertainty using ensemble modeling.
    Liu Y; Gunawan R
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Feb; 244():34-44. PubMed ID: 28137617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparative study of stochastic algorithms for system optimization based on gradient approximations.
    Chin DC
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 1997; 27(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 18255862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Suboptimal control of fed-batch bioprocesses using phase properties.
    Diener A; Goldschmidt B
    J Biotechnol; 1994 Mar; 33(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 7764726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Optimal process mode selection for clone screening.
    Strnad J; Spudić V; Brinc M; Pungerčar JR; Kravanja Z
    Acta Chim Slov; 2011 Jun; 58(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 24062044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of the physical annealing strategy for simulated annealing: a function-based analysis in the landscape paradigm.
    Hasegawa M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 May; 85(5 Pt 2):056704. PubMed ID: 23004900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The application of a Pareto optimisation method in the design of an integrated bioprocess.
    Zhou YH; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2003 Jul; 25(6):349-55. PubMed ID: 13680340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Hybrid physics-based and data-driven modeling for bioprocess online simulation and optimization.
    Zhang D; Del Rio-Chanona EA; Petsagkourakis P; Wagner J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2019 Nov; 116(11):2919-2930. PubMed ID: 31317536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A new sensitivity-based adaptive control vector parameterization approach for dynamic optimization of bioprocesses.
    Wang L; Liu X; Zhang Z
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2017 Feb; 40(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 27651321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Production optimization for concentration and volume-limited fed-batch reactors in biochemical processes.
    Liu P; Liu X; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Yang C; Gui W
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2018 Mar; 41(3):407-422. PubMed ID: 29222589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Optimum oil production planning using infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm.
    Singh HK; Ray T; Sarker R
    Evol Comput; 2013; 21(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 22171946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Toward a modeling, optimization, and predictive control framework for fed-batch metabolic cybergenetics.
    Espinel-Ríos S; Morabito B; Pohlodek J; Bettenbrock K; Klamt S; Findeisen R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2024 Jan; 121(1):366-379. PubMed ID: 37942516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Comparison of parameter optimization algorithms for environmental model].
    Yi L; Chen J; Du P
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2002 Mar; 23(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 12048802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Multi-objective simulated annealing for hyper-parameter optimization in convolutional neural networks.
    Gülcü A; Kuş Z
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e338. PubMed ID: 33816989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. An Improved Simulated Annealing-Based Decision Model for the Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling of Aviation Ordnance Handling.
    Meng X; Wang N; Liu J; Liu Q
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1843675. PubMed ID: 35154297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.