208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296524)
1. Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.
Hagopian LP; Long ES; Rush KS
Behav Modif; 2004 Sep; 28(5):668-77. PubMed ID: 15296524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
Smith RG; Iwata BA; Shore BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 7706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.
Horrocks E; Higbee TS
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17097267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
Fleming CV; Wheeler GM; Cannella-Malone HI; Basbagill AR; Chung YC; Day KG
Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):266-75. PubMed ID: 20629593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
Gottschalk JM; Libby ME; Graff RB
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10738955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities.
O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Rispoli M; Lang R; Chan J; Machalicek W; Langthorne P
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 17629672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.
Klatt KP; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11214025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hypothesis-based interventions for tantrum behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities in school settings.
Repp AC; Karsh KG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 8188561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a video-based assessment and a multiple stimulus assessment to identify preferred jobs for individuals with significant intellectual disabilities.
Horrocks EL; Morgan RL
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 19231132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.
Waldron-Soler KM; Martella RC; Marchand-Martella NE; Ebey TL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 10738957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.
Green CW; Reid DH; Canipe VS; Gardner SM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 1836459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using brief assessments to evaluate aberrant behavior maintained by attention.
O'Reilly MF; Lancioni GE; King L; Lally G; Dhomhnaill ON
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 10738961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.
Kelly MA; Roscoe EM; Hanley GP; Schlichenmeyer K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.
Fisher WW; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Amari A
Am J Ment Retard; 1996 Jul; 101(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8827248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
Kodak T; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Kisamore A
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli.
Kuhn DE; DeLeon IG; Terlonge C; Goysovich R
Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 16263239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-sensory rooms: comparing effects of the Snoezelen and the Stimulus Preference environment on the behavior of adults with profound mental retardation.
Fava L; Strauss K
Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 19815373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional assessment of challenging behavior: toward a strategy for applied settings.
Matson JL; Minshawi NF
Res Dev Disabil; 2007; 28(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 16765024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
