208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296524)
21. Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.
Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Wallace MD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 12365742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature.
Kang S; O'Reilly M; Lancioni G; Falcomata TS; Sigafoos J; Xu Z
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1125-33. PubMed ID: 23357675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.
Reid DH; Everson JM; Green CW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 10641301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.
Lohrmann-O'Rourke S; Browder DM
Am J Ment Retard; 1998 Sep; 103(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 9779282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.
Vollmer TR; Iwata BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 1890048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
Paclawskyj TR; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7541398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
Taravella CC; Lerman DC; Contrucci SA; Roane HS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 10738960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Behavioral interventions to reduce the pica of persons with developmental disabilities.
McAdam DB; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB; Napolitano DA
Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 14710707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment and treatment of aggressive behavior without a clear social function.
Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Mews JB; Boelter EW; Christensen TJ
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 17646083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.
Foster-Johnson L; Ferro J; Dunlap G
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 7928791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Functional assessment of problem behaviors in adults with mental retardation.
Paclawskyj TR; Kurtz PF; O'Connor JT
Behav Modif; 2004 Sep; 28(5):649-67. PubMed ID: 15296523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two measures of preference during forced-choice assessments.
Derby KM; Wacker DP; Andelman M; Berg W; Drew J; Asmus J; Prouty AM; Laffey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):345-6. PubMed ID: 7592152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhancing tolerance to delayed reinforcers: the role of intervening activities.
Dixon MR; Rehfeldt RA; Randich L
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 12858992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.
Parsons MB; Reid DH
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 2373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training.
Ringdahl JE; Falcomata TS; Christensen TJ; Bass-Ringdahl SM; Lentz A; Dutt A; Schuh-Claus J
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18672344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sensitivity theory and mental retardation: why functional analysis is not enough.
Reiss S; Havercamp SM
Am J Ment Retard; 1997 May; 101(6):553-66. PubMed ID: 9152472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders.
Karsten AM; Carr JE; Lepper TL
Behav Modif; 2011 Jul; 35(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 21613240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
Zhou L; Iwata BA; Goff GA; Shore BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 11421310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
