119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296816)
1. Incorporating the sampling variation of the disease prevalence when calculating the sample size in a study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a test.
Yi Q; Panzarella T; Corey P
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 15296816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.
Flahault A; Cadilhac M; Thomas G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):859-62. PubMed ID: 16018921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing 2-phase prevalence studies in the absence of a "gold standard" test.
Salim A; Welsh AH
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 170(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 19505999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
Bloch DA
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pepe MS; Janes H
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.
Carley S; Dosman S; Jones SR; Harrison M
Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 15735264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.
Marais BJ; Gie RP; Hesseling AC; Schaaf HS; Lombard C; Enarson DA; Beyers N
Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1350-9. PubMed ID: 17079536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.
Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM; Irwig L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 18778913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in diagnostic accuracy can be estimated using simple population weighting.
Björk J; Grubb A; Nyman U
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 19095167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poisson sampling: a sampling strategy for concurrently establishing freedom from disease and estimating population characteristics.
Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ
Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 19217677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies.
Li J; Fine J
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2537-50. PubMed ID: 15287083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
