263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15296992)
1. Totally implantable femoral vein catheters in cancer patients.
Wolosker N; Yazbek G; Munia MA; Zerati AE; Langer M; Nishinari K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Sep; 30(7):771-5. PubMed ID: 15296992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the femoral vein as insertion site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
Falk A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 17327554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.
Merrell SW; Peatross BG; Grossman MD; Sullivan JJ; Harker WG
West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8128698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Totally implantable venous catheters for chemotherapy: experience in 500 patients.
Wolosker N; Yazbek G; Nishinari K; Malavolta LC; Munia MA; Langer M; Zerati AE
Sao Paulo Med J; 2004 Jul; 122(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 15543368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of rifampicin-miconazole-impregnated catheters reduces the incidence of femoral and jugular catheter-related bacteremia.
Lorente L; Lecuona M; Ramos MJ; Jiménez A; Mora ML; Sierra A
Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Nov; 47(9):1171-5. PubMed ID: 18808356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Implantable devices for central venous access in cancer patients. Our experience in 217 cases].
Torramadé J; Hernández JL; Cienfuegos JA; Albiach M; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Voltas J
Med Clin (Barc); 1992 May; 98(19):731-3. PubMed ID: 1608278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tunneled femoral vein catheterization for long term hemodialysis: a single center experience.
Al-Hwiesh AK; Abdul-Rahaman IS
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2007 Mar; 18(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17237889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percutaneous placement of femoral central venous catheter in patients undergoing transplantation of bone marrow.
Lazarus HM; Creger RJ; Bloom AD; Shenk R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 May; 170(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 2183372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Totally implantable venous access ports: frequency of complications and analysis of bacterial contamination after ablation].
Barbut F; Soukouna S; Lalande V; Garcia ML; Neyme D; de Gramont A; Petit JC
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):566-74. PubMed ID: 15596304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Totally implantable central venous access ports. Analysis of 700 cases.
Barbetakis N; Asteriou C; Kleontas A; Tsilikas C
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 104(6):654-6. PubMed ID: 21671465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferior vena cava catheterization in the neonate by the percutaneous femoral vein method.
Serrao PR; Jean-Louis J; Godoy J; Prado A
J Perinatol; 1996; 16(2 Pt 1):129-32. PubMed ID: 8732562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A safe and effective method to implant a totally implantable access port in patients with synchronous bilateral mastectomies: modified femoral vein approach.
Chen SY; Lin CH; Chang HM; Hsu HM; Yu JC
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 98(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 18704915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central venous catheter-associated complications in infants with single ventricle: comparison of umbilical and femoral venous access routes.
Aiyagari R; Song JY; Donohue JE; Yu S; Gaies MG
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 13(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 22805159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thrombosis of the superior vena cava and auxiliary branches in patients with indwelling catheterization of the internal jugular vein.
Li H; Wang SX; Wang W; Xu C; Shen S; Yu L; Zhang GZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Mar; 122(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 19323936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
