191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15299057)
1. Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach.
Sundaram SK; Freedman NM; Carrasquillo JA; Carson JM; Whatley M; Libutti SK; Sellers D; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1328-33. PubMed ID: 15299057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Searching for alternatives to full kinetic analysis in 18F-FDG PET: an extension of the simplified kinetic analysis method.
Hapdey S; Buvat I; Carson JM; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 21421718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans.
Freedman NM; Sundaram SK; Kurdziel K; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Carson JM; Sellers D; Libutti SK; Yang JC; Bacharach SL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12483409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring [(18)F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods.
Krak NC; van der Hoeven JJ; Hoekstra OS; Twisk JW; van der Wall E; Lammertsma AA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 12640556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG uptake and clearance in patients with compromised renal function.
Akers SR; Werner TJ; Rubello D; Alavi A; Cheng G
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Aug; 37(8):825-32. PubMed ID: 27058366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans.
Brenner W; Vernon C; Muzi M; Mankoff DA; Link JM; Conrad EU; Eary JF
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1493-500. PubMed ID: 15347716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences.
Beaulieu S; Kinahan P; Tseng J; Dunnwald LK; Schubert EK; Pham P; Lewellen B; Mankoff DA
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1044-50. PubMed ID: 12843218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatable noninvasive measurement of mouse myocardial glucose uptake with 18F-FDG: evaluation of tracer kinetics in a type 1 diabetes model.
Thorn SL; deKemp RA; Dumouchel T; Klein R; Renaud JM; Wells RG; Gollob MH; Beanlands RS; DaSilva JN
J Nucl Med; 2013 Sep; 54(9):1637-44. PubMed ID: 23940301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shortened PET data acquisition protocol for the quantification of 18F-FDG kinetics.
Strauss LG; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Haberkorn U
J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1933-9. PubMed ID: 14660719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of methods to quantitate 18F-FDG uptake with PET during experimental acute lung injury.
Chen DL; Mintun MA; Schuster DP
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1583-90. PubMed ID: 15347728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic and static approaches to quantifying 18F-FDG uptake for measuring cancer response to therapy, including the effect of granulocyte CSF.
Doot RK; Dunnwald LK; Schubert EK; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Kinahan PE; Kurland BF; Mankoff DA
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 48(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 17504870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is liver SUV stable over time in ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging?
Laffon E; Adhoute X; de Clermont H; Marthan R
J Nucl Med Technol; 2011 Dec; 39(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 21878481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplified quantification of FDG metabolism in tumors using the autoradiographic method is less dependent on the acquisition time than SUV.
Burger IA; Burger C; Berthold T; Buck A
Nucl Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 38(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 21843779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional myocardial uptake in patients without heart disease under fasting conditions on repeated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Inglese E; Leva L; Matheoud R; Sacchetti G; Secco C; Gandolfo P; Brambilla M; Sambuceti G
J Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 48(10):1662-9. PubMed ID: 17873124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple quantification of skeletal muscle glucose utilization by static 18F-FDG PET.
Yokoyama I; Inoue Y; Moritan T; Ohtomo K; Nagai R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Oct; 44(10):1592-8. PubMed ID: 14530472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of cerebral glucose metabolic rates in the anesthetized rat by dynamic scanning with 18F-FDG, the ATLAS small animal PET scanner, and arterial blood sampling.
Shimoji K; Ravasi L; Schmidt K; Soto-Montenegro ML; Esaki T; Seidel J; Jagoda E; Sokoloff L; Green MV; Eckelman WC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 15073264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic PET-CT studies for characterizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma metabolism: comparison of analytical methods.
Huang B; Khong PL; Kwong DL; Hung B; Wong CS; Wong CY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Feb; 33(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 22107997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [
Sari H; Eriksson L; Mingels C; Alberts I; Casey ME; Afshar-Oromieh A; Conti M; Cumming P; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jan; 50(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 36192468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
