151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1529964)
1. Comparative DNA analysis of solid tumors by flow cytometric and image analyses of touch imprints and flow cell suspensions.
Elsheikh TM; Silverman JF; McCool JW; Riley RS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Sep; 98(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 1529964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry.
Ghali VS; Liau S; Teplitz C; Prudente R
Cancer; 1992 Dec; 70(11):2668-72. PubMed ID: 1423197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of DNA quantitation in breast carcinoma with image cytometric analysis and in vitro fine-needle aspiration with flow cytometric analysis.
Lajoie G; Zbieranowski I; Demianiuk C; Knape WA; Edinger MG; Tubbs RR; Murray D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Oct; 100(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 8213641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P
Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of image analysis with flow cytometry for DNA content analysis in pigmented lesions of the skin.
Sangueza OP; Hyder DM; White CR; Pallander J; Perkins M; Remple N; Bakke A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Feb; 14(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 1558616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of DNA content estimated by flow and image cytometry in breast tumor samples.
Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Swiatkiewicz I; Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A
Pol J Pathol; 2001; 52(1-2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11505676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new slide-based laser scanning cytometer for DNA analysis of tumors. Comparison with flow cytometry and image analysis.
Martin-Reay DG; Kamentsky LA; Weinberg DS; Hollister KA; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 7942599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA ploidy analysis in breast carcinoma. Comparison of unfixed and fixed tissue analyzed by image and flow cytometry.
Ottesen GL; Christensen IJ; Larsen JK; Larsen J; Christiansen J; Baldetorp B; Linden T; Hansen B; Andersen JA
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 9349901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA content measurement can be obtained using archival material for DNA flow cytometry. A comparison with cytogenetic analysis in 56 pediatric solid tumors.
Dressler LG; Duncan MH; Varsa EE; McConnell TS
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(6):2033-41. PubMed ID: 8395970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Dawson AE; Norton JA; Weinberg DS
Am J Pathol; 1990 May; 136(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 1972000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative DNA analysis of fresh solid tumors by flow and image cytometric methods: a comparison using the Roche Pathology Workstation Image Analyzer.
Ellison DA; Maygarden SJ; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1995 Apr; 8(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 7617654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caveats in the estimation of DNA-ploidy in paraffin embedded specimens of primary prostate cancer and lymph node metastases by flow and image cytometry.
Berner A; Danielsen HE; Juul NO; Juul ME; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Nesland JM; Fosså SD
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov; 5(6):339-52. PubMed ID: 8305330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA quantitation of distal bile duct carcinoma measured by image and flow cytometry.
Rijken AM; Belien JA; van Gulik TM; Polak MM; Offerhaus GJ; Gouma DJ; Baak JP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10560507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image analysis confirmation of DNA aneuploidy in flow cytometric DNA distributions having a wide coefficient of variation of the G0/G1 peak.
McFadden PW; Clowry LJ; Daehnert K; Hause LL; Koethe SM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 93(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 2327365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation.
Danque PO; Chen HB; Patil J; Jagirdar J; Orsatti G; Paronetto F
Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer.
Kaern J; Wetteland J; Tropé CG; Farrants GW; Juhng SW; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Danielsen HE
Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 1576895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
