101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1530037)
1. Computed tomography: does it really improve the treatment of cervical carcinoma?
Moore DH; Dotters DJ; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 167(3):768-21. PubMed ID: 1530037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Importance of computed tomography for the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of cervix cancer].
Waldmann R; Ziegler F; Schumacher T
Rontgenpraxis; 1986 Jan; 39(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 3952568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computerized axial tomography in the staging of cervix uteri carcinoma].
Petrocchi L; Spagnolo R; Winkler S
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1984; 105(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 6732098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate diagnosis of regional metastasis from cervical cancer: is PET the answer?
Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):637-8. PubMed ID: 15183466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When and how often should PET scans be performed in the management of cervical cancer?
Lai CH; Yen TC
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Jul; 10(7):983-6. PubMed ID: 20645685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomography in invasive carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal.
Villasanta U; Whitley NO; Haney PJ; Brenner D
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 6866364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis.
Kidd EA; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Rader JS; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(12):2108-13. PubMed ID: 20308664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The potentials of computed axial tomography (CAT) in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Gochev G; Totsev N; Vasilev D; Simeonova L; Ianev N; Elenchev L
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 7793520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography in evaluation of gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis.
King LA; Talledo OE; Gallup DG; el Gammal TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 155(5):960-4. PubMed ID: 3535520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomographic evaluation of hydronephrosis in uterine carcinoma.
Ishii C; Tada S; Kato Y; Tanaka H
Radiat Med; 1983; 1(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 6679895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Reyhan M; Parlak C; Guler OC; Oymak E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 23792605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Computer tomography in gynecology].
Breit A; Rohde U
Med Klin; 1979 Dec; 74(50):1881-93. PubMed ID: 542172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Metabolic response of lymph nodes immediately after RT is related with survival outcome of patients with pelvic node-positive cervical cancer using consecutive [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Yoon MS; Ahn SJ; Nah BS; Chung WK; Song HC; Yoo SW; Song JY; Jeong JU; Nam TK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(4):e491-7. PubMed ID: 22818418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Computed tomography in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Kolesnikova EK
Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1986 Nov; (11):18-23. PubMed ID: 2949642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The contribution of new imaging techniques in staging cervical cancer.
Grigsby PW
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S10-2. PubMed ID: 17727940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolated mediastinal lymph node false positivity of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with cervical cancer.
Onal C; Oymak E; Findikcioglu A; Reyhan M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Feb; 23(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23358181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
