286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15300444)
1. Regulation of the DNA replication fork: a way to fight genomic instability.
Toueille M; Hübscher U
Chromosoma; 2004 Sep; 113(3):113-25. PubMed ID: 15300444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA replication fork proteins.
Hübscher U
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 521():19-33. PubMed ID: 19563099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
Cortez D
DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():149-157. PubMed ID: 25957489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinct functions of human RecQ helicases during DNA replication.
Urban V; Dobrovolna J; Janscak P
Biophys Chem; 2017 Jun; 225():20-26. PubMed ID: 27876204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.
Alexander JL; Orr-Weaver TL
Genes Dev; 2016 Oct; 30(20):2241-2252. PubMed ID: 27898391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromatin immunoprecipitation to detect DNA replication and repair factors.
Gadaleta MC; Iwasaki O; Noguchi C; Noma K; Noguchi E
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1300():169-86. PubMed ID: 25916713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role and Regulation of the RECQL4 Family during Genomic Integrity Maintenance.
Luong TT; Bernstein KA
Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RecQ helicases: lessons from model organisms.
Cobb JA; Bjergbaek L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(15):4106-14. PubMed ID: 16936315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance.
Bjergbaek L; Cobb JA; Tsai-Pflugfelder M; Gasser SM
EMBO J; 2005 Jan; 24(2):405-17. PubMed ID: 15616582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Termination of DNA replication forks: "Breaking up is hard to do".
Bailey R; Priego Moreno S; Gambus A
Nucleus; 2015; 6(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 25835602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dna2 on the road to Okazaki fragment processing and genome stability in eukaryotes.
Kang YH; Lee CH; Seo YS
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 20131965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.
Cortez D
Mol Cell; 2019 Jun; 74(5):866-876. PubMed ID: 31173722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.
Alexander JL; Barrasa MI; Orr-Weaver TL
Curr Biol; 2015 Jun; 25(12):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26051888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interplay between wrn and the checkpoint in s-phase.
Pichierri P
Ital J Biochem; 2007 Jun; 56(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 17722654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.
De Piccoli G; Katou Y; Itoh T; Nakato R; Shirahige K; Labib K
Mol Cell; 2012 Mar; 45(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 22325992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The MCM helicase: linking checkpoints to the replication fork.
Forsburg SL
Biochem Soc Trans; 2008 Feb; 36(Pt 1):114-9. PubMed ID: 18208397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deletion of BRCA2 exon 27 causes defects in response to both stalled and collapsed replication forks.
Kim TM; Son MY; Dodds S; Hu L; Hasty P
Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():66-72. PubMed ID: 25773776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
