These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15301620)

  • 21. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.
    Binder KS; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 10464948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1151-65. PubMed ID: 24205888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A further examination of the lexical-processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 23456972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words.
    Nazir TA; Ben-Boutayab N; Decoppet N; Deutsch A; Frost R
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):294-311. PubMed ID: 14967213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.
    Hautala J; Hyönä J; Aro M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1719-27. PubMed ID: 21664920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005).
    Pollatsek A; Reichle ED; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention to one word at a time in reading is still a viable hypothesis: rejoinder to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006).
    Pollatsek A; Reichle ED; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1496-500. PubMed ID: 17154789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Marrier d'Unienville V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1220-49. PubMed ID: 17924819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading disappearing text.
    Rayner K; Yang J; Castelhano MS; Liversedge SP
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 21142374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.
    Dimigen O; Sommer W; Hohlfeld A; Jacobs AM; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):552-72. PubMed ID: 21744985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word integration and regression programming during reading: a test of the E-Z reader 10 model.
    Inhoff AW; Greenberg SN; Solomon M; Wang CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1571-84. PubMed ID: 19803657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Different behavioral and eye movement patterns of dyslexic readers with and without attentional deficits during single word reading.
    Thaler V; Urton K; Heine A; Hawelka S; Engl V; Jacobs AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2436-45. PubMed ID: 19383502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 16545344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading.
    Frisson S; Rayner K; Pickering MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):862-77. PubMed ID: 16248738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
    Johnson RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.