These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15303544)

  • 1. [Surveillance and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in asymptomatic increased risk subjects of colorectal cancer: Ferrara experience].
    Matarese V; Pezzoli A; Trevisani L; Boccia S; Brancaleoni M; Simone L; Feo C; Gullini S
    Recenti Prog Med; 2004; 95(7-8):352-7. PubMed ID: 15303544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Colonoscopy surveillance in asymptomatic subjects with increased risk for colorectal cancer: clinical evaluation and cost analysis of an Italian experience.
    Matarese VG; Feo CV; Pezzoli A; Trevisani L; Brancaleoni M; Gullini S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Aug; 16(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 17554201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A decision-analytic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening programs.
    Ramsey SD; Wilschut J; Boer R; van Ballegooijen M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1861-9. PubMed ID: 20461066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening of colorectal cancer.
    Winawer SJ
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):699-722. PubMed ID: 16226687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effectiveness and costs of screening colonoscopy].
    Neuhaus H
    Fortschr Med; 1995 Sep; 113(27):381-4. PubMed ID: 7498861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling future capacity needs and spending on colonoscopy in the English bowel cancer screening programme.
    Nnoaham KE; Lines C
    Gut; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1238-45. PubMed ID: 18441004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Screening for colorectal cancer in high-risk and intermediate-risk subject: what's the best tool?].
    Trevisani L; Cifalà V; Sartori S; Tombesi P; Matarese V; Pezzoli A; Abbasciano V
    Recenti Prog Med; 2009 Feb; 100(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 19350797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
    Schnoll-Sussman F; Markowitz AJ; Winawer SJ
    Semin Oncol; 2000 Oct; 27(5 Suppl 10):10-21. PubMed ID: 11049028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
    Heitman SJ; Manns BJ; Hilsden RJ; Fong A; Dean S; Romagnuolo J
    CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):877-81. PubMed ID: 16217110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
    Markowitz AJ; Winawer SJ
    Semin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 26(5):485-98. PubMed ID: 10528896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.
    Tscheulin DK; Drevs F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19449159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Periodic colonoscopic examinations of persons with a positive family history for colorectal cancer. Work Group 'Hereditary non-polyposis- colon-rectum cancers'].
    Vasen HF; Nagengast FM; Griffioen G; Kleibeuker JH; Menko FH; Taal BG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jun; 143(23):1211-4. PubMed ID: 10389536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-saving analysis of screening colonoscopy in Germany.
    Sieg A; Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 17874356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
    Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal cancer in women: an equal opportunity disease.
    Osias GL; Osias KB; Srinivasan R
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2001 Dec; 101(12 Suppl Pt 2):S7-12. PubMed ID: 11794751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer.
    Budenholzer B; Welch HG
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Aug; 135(3):219. PubMed ID: 11487493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer].
    Scintu F; Canalis C; Capra F; D'Alia G; Giordano M; Mocci P; Pisano M; Casula G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2000; 71(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 11347322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer.
    Kahi CJ; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Jul; 15(3):533-47, ix. PubMed ID: 15990056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.