229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15303716)
1. Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge?
de Bruin LM; de Kreuk MK; van der Roest HF; Uijterlinde C; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15303716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor.
Schwarzenbeck N; Borges JM; Wilderer PA
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Mar; 66(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15558277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sludge treatment by ozonation--evaluation of full-scale results.
Sievers M; Ried A; Koll R
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 15077979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effective solutions for sewage treatment in developing countries--the case of Brazil.
Jordão EP; Volschan I
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):237-42. PubMed ID: 15553481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causes and control of filamentous growth in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors.
Liu Y; Liu QS
Biotechnol Adv; 2006; 24(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 16150563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation and assessment of sludge pre-treatment processes.
Müller JA; Winter A; Strünkmann G
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(10):97-104. PubMed ID: 15259943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process.
Fuchs W; Resch C; Kernstock M; Mayer M; Schoeberl P; Braun R
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 15743625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. North American performance experience with anoxic and anaerobic selectors for activated sludge bulking control.
Parker D; Appleton R; Bratby J; Melcer H
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):221-8. PubMed ID: 15553479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoate) production potential of activated sludge treating wastewater.
Takabatake H; Satoh H; Mino T; Matsuo T
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):119-26. PubMed ID: 12201092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A strategy in wastewater treatment process for significant reduction of excess sludge production.
Shiota N; Akashi A; Hasegawa S
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):127-34. PubMed ID: 12201093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wastewater treatment with the internal MEMBIOR.
Cornelissen ER; Janse W; Koning J
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):139-43. PubMed ID: 15954574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced treatment by anaerobic process followed by aerobic membrane bioreactor for effluent reuse in paper mill industry.
Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Galil NI
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15461419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing sequencing batch reactor (SBR) reactor operation for treatment of dairy wastewater with aerobic granular sludge.
Wichern M; Lübken M; Horn H
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18845857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aerobic granular sludge: characterization, mechanism of granulation and application to wastewater treatment.
Gao D; Liu L; Liang H; Wu WM
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2011 Jun; 31(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 20919817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upgrading of existing aerobic plants with the LUCAS anaerobic system based on full-scale experiences.
Gerards R; Gils W; Vriens L
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):39-46. PubMed ID: 16235744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of high-ammonium anaerobic digester supernatant by aerobic granular sludge and ultrafiltration processes.
Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A; Zielińska M; Bernat K; Wojnowska-Baryła I; Truchan T
Chemosphere; 2013 Feb; 90(8):2208-15. PubMed ID: 23089393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A direct comparison amongst different technologies (aerobic granular sludge, SBR and MBR) for the treatment of wastewater contaminated by 4-chlorophenol.
Carucci A; Milia S; Cappai G; Muntoni A
J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):1119-25. PubMed ID: 20116174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
