These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Investigating the numerical effects of ascertainment bias in linkage analysis: development of methods and preliminary results. Slager SL; Vieland VJ Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1119-24. PubMed ID: 9433634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait. Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ascertainment bias in linkage analysis: comments on Ginsburg et al. Vieland VJ; Hodge SE Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):283-5; author reply 286-7. PubMed ID: 15578735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Planning of sampling for linkage analysis. Sample size and sampling method]. Aksenovich TI; Ginzburg EKh Genetika; 1993 Sep; 29(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 8276222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees. Wang K Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data. Boehnke M; Lange K Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivariate and multilocus variance components method, based on structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH. Province MA; Rice TK; Borecki IB; Gu C; Kraja A; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 12548674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MCMC-based linkage analysis for complex traits on general pedigrees: multipoint analysis with a two-locus model and a polygenic component. Sung YJ; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17123301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: sequential schemes for sibships. Thompson EA Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 7272417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait. Dawson DV; Elston RC Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of sequential sampling rules and ascertainment correction on genetic analysis. Skolnick MH; Bishop DT; Thomas A Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():177-82. PubMed ID: 2622950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Note on linkage analysis when the mode of transmission is unknown. Neuman RJ; Rice JP Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):349-58. PubMed ID: 2253869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linkage analysis with sequential imputation. Skrivanek Z; Lin S; Irwin M Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 12813724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing accuracy in linkage analysis by means of confidence regions. Hössjer O Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 12813727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset. Dawson DV Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]