These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15305325)

  • 21. LINKAGE programs: linkage analysis for monogenic cardiovascular diseases.
    Li L; Wang QK; Rao S
    Methods Mol Med; 2006; 128():41-60. PubMed ID: 17071989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robust ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimation.
    Noh M; Lee Y; Pawitan Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 29(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15892092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 16685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Constructing linkage maps with achiasmatic gametogenesis.
    Wu JX; Zhu J; Jenkins JN; McCarty JC
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jun; 32(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 16018188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal peeling order for pedigrees with incomplete genotypic information.
    Belonogova NM; Axenovich TI
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Jun; 31(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 17500037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: results of segregation analyses using POINTER and linkage analyses using LIPED.
    Cox NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 14964297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Score test for detecting linkage to complex traits in selected samples.
    Lebrec J; Putter H; Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 15305326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the asymptotic behavior of the estimate of the recombination fraction under the null hypothesis of no linkage when the model is misspecified.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 2253866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: segregation and three-locus linkage analysis.
    Bishop DT; Cannon LA; Hasstedt SH; Skolnick MH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 14964294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Estimation of the recombination fraction by the maximum likelihood method in mapping interacting genes relative to marker loci].
    Priiatkina SN
    Genetika; 2002 May; 38(5):678-94. PubMed ID: 12068553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating penetrance from family data using a retrospective likelihood when ascertainment depends on genotype and age of onset.
    Carayol J; Bonaïti-Pellié C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15305327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Analysis of quantitative trait loci using hybrid pedigrees: quantitative traits of animals].
    Svishcheva GR
    Genetika; 2007 Feb; 43(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 17385327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving estimates of genetic maps: a maximum likelihood approach.
    Stewart WC; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16984314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MOD-score analysis with simple pedigrees: an overview of likelihood-based linkage methods.
    Strauch K
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 17536213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Censored survival models for genetic epidemiology: a Gibbs sampling approach.
    Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 8013897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Conditional likelihood score functions for mixed models in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):313-32. PubMed ID: 15772109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ascertainment bias in the estimation of sibling genetic risk parameters.
    Olson JM; Cordell HJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):217-35. PubMed ID: 10723107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. QTL mapping under ascertainment.
    Peng J; Siegmund D
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):867-81. PubMed ID: 17044862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.