These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15305801)

  • 21. Who is accountable?
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7166):1. PubMed ID: 17972835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scientific misconduct: more cops, more robbers?
    Macilwain C
    Cell; 2012 Jun; 149(7):1417-9. PubMed ID: 22726427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brave new worlds.
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7210):137-8. PubMed ID: 18784666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
    Bernstein J
    Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
    Vences M; Zardoya R
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.
    Farthing MJ
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Mar; 29(3):422-7. PubMed ID: 24372677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Seven ages of the PhD.
    Gosling R; Tickle C; Running SW; Tandong Y; Dinnyes A; Osowole AA; Cule E
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7343):283-6. PubMed ID: 21512550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
    Wada M
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hwang verdict imminent.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7267):1035. PubMed ID: 19847229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
    Else H
    Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disgraced cloner's ally is cleared of misconduct.
    Marris E; Check E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):768-9. PubMed ID: 16482112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retractions of the year.
    Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. If you can lose a driving licence, why not a PhD?
    Hart AG
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6999):503. PubMed ID: 15282578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
    Bentley P
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Blow follows blow for stem-cell work.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7072):8. PubMed ID: 16397471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.