236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15305918)
1. Suppressive subtractive hybridization as a tool for identifying genetic diversity in an environmental metagenome: the rumen as a model.
Galbraith EA; Antonopoulos DA; White BA
Environ Microbiol; 2004 Sep; 6(9):928-37. PubMed ID: 15305918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic diversity and diet specificity of ruminal Prevotella revealed by 16S rRNA gene-based analysis.
Bekele AZ; Koike S; Kobayashi Y
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Apr; 305(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 20158525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the suppressive subtractive hybridization method in Mycoplasma agalactiae species by the comparison of a field strain with the type strain PG2.
Marenda MS; Vilei EM; Poumarat F; Frey J; Berthelot X
Vet Res; 2004; 35(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 15099496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of suppressive subtractive hybridization to identify Flavobacterium columnare DNA sequences not shared with Flavobacterium johnsoniae.
Olivares-Fuster O; Arias CR
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 18444979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ruminococcus bromii, identification and isolation as a dominant community member in the rumen of cattle fed a barley diet.
Klieve AV; O'Leary MN; McMillen L; Ouwerkerk D
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 103(6):2065-73. PubMed ID: 18045390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of suppressive subtractive hybridization to uncover the metagenomic diversity of environmental samples.
Galbraith EA; Antonopoulos DA; White BA
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 410():295-333. PubMed ID: 18642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of genetic differences between two clinical isolates of Streptococcus mutans by suppression subtractive hybridization.
Guo LH; Shi JN; Zhang Y; Liu XD; Duan J; Wei S
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2006 Dec; 21(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 17064395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phylogenetic characterization of a biogas plant microbial community integrating clone library 16S-rDNA sequences and metagenome sequence data obtained by 454-pyrosequencing.
Kröber M; Bekel T; Diaz NN; Goesmann A; Jaenicke S; Krause L; Miller D; Runte KJ; Viehöver P; Pühler A; Schlüter A
J Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 142(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 19480946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Phylogenetic diversity analyse of rumen bacteria using culture independent method].
Wang YL; Yang RH; Mao AJ; Wang JQ; Dong ZY
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2005 Dec; 45(6):915-9. PubMed ID: 16496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester.
Chouari R; Le Paslier D; Daegelen P; Ginestet P; Weissenbach J; Sghir A
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 7(8):1104-15. PubMed ID: 16011748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suppression subtractive hybridisation allows selective sampling of metagenomic subsets of interest.
Chew YV; Holmes AJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Aug; 78(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 19442689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic variability of rumen Selenomonads.
Pristas P; Piknova M; Sprincova A; Javorsky P
Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2008; 53(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 18837167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes to the rumen bacterial population of sheep with the addition of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene to their diet.
Perumbakkam S; Mitchell EA; Craig AM
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2011 Feb; 99(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 20607404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of group-specific, 16S rRNA-targeted scissor probes for quantitative detection of predominant bacterial populations in dairy cattle rumen.
Uyeno Y; Sekiguchi Y; Tajima K; Takenaka A; Kurihara M; Kamagata Y
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 103(5):1995-2005. PubMed ID: 17953610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening and identification of male-specific DNA fragments in common carps Cyprinus carpio using suppression subtractive hybridization.
Chen JJ; Du QY; Yue YY; Dang BJ; Chang ZJ
J Fish Biol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):403-13. PubMed ID: 20646164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suppression subtractive hybridization.
Rebrikov DV; Desai SM; Siebert PD; Lukyanov SA
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 258():107-34. PubMed ID: 14970460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of large-insert DNA libraries from soil for environmental genomic studies of Archaea.
Treusch AH; Kletzin A; Raddatz G; Ochsenreiter T; Quaiser A; Meurer G; Schuster SC; Schleper C
Environ Microbiol; 2004 Sep; 6(9):970-80. PubMed ID: 15305922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and quantitative analyses of a universal rRNA-subtraction protocol for microbial metatranscriptomics.
Stewart FJ; Ottesen EA; DeLong EF
ISME J; 2010 Jul; 4(7):896-907. PubMed ID: 20220791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of competitive DNA hybridization to identify differences in the genomes of bacteria.
Shanks OC; Santo Domingo JW; Graham JE
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Aug; 66(2):321-30. PubMed ID: 16469400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification Leptospira santarosai serovar shermani specific sequences by suppression subtractive hybridization.
Hsieh WJ; Pan MJ
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 15158270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
