150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15307457)
1. Analysis of cervical smears in a Muslim population.
Wasti S; Ahmed W; Jafri A; Khan B; Sohail R; Hassan S
Ann Saudi Med; 2004; 24(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 15307457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of screening for cervical cancer among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Brazil.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Vale DB; Vieira LF; Lima MT; Zeferino LC; Dufloth RM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 130(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 26044115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening program in a Muslim country: three-year experience at the Aga Khan University Medical Center, Karachi.
Rasul S; Khan KS; Rizvi JH; Hassan SH; Maniar S
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Mar; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2064585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears.
Melamed MR
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):200; author reply 200-1. PubMed ID: 15211480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of cervical screening results in a population at normal risk.
Karabulut A; Alan T; Ali Ekiz M; Iritaş A; Kesen Z; Yahşi S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 20362986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Factors associated with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women].
Fan L; Zou LY; Wu YM; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20420780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma by microsatellite analysis of Papanicolaou smears.
Rha SH; Dong SM; Jen J; Nicol T; Sidransky D
Int J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 93(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 11433409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology: a retrospective analysis of 50,340 cases].
Ma AG; Li Y; He QZ; Ye JL; Lu HJ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 38(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19573361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities.
Kavoussi SK; Smith YR; Ernst SD; Quint EH
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009; 18(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital.
Khaengkhor P; Mairaing K; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21534360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in female sex workers in Hong Kong.
Leung KM; Yeoh GP; Cheung HN; Fong FY; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Jun; 19(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 23650200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era?
Subramaniam A; Fauci JM; Schneider KE; Whitworth JM; Erickson BK; Kim K; Huh WK
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 21263352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
Mostafa MG; Srivannaboon S; Rachanawutanon M
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The results of screening program for cervical cancer in Lodz].
Gottwald L; Giernat L; Lech W; Wójcik-Krowiranda K; Akoel KM; Kowalczyk-Amico K; Estemberg D; Grzesiak M; Sosnowski D; Guzowski G; Baś E; Tyliński W; Bieńkiewicz A
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):934-8. PubMed ID: 12722377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extension of organised cervical cancer screening programmes in Italy and their process indicators.
Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):33-47. PubMed ID: 17824361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reasons for cervical cancer despite extensive screening.
Stenkvist B; Söderström J
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 9041486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do health care providers have a lower prevalence of abnormal pap smears than the general public?
Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravatana K; Kheolamai P; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S114-9. PubMed ID: 21294405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
