These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15307978)

  • 21. [Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].
    Bourtembourg A; Mangin M; Ramanah R; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Jun; 42(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 23453918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database.
    Black C; Kaye JA; Jick H
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 15994631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S; Fabia J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Caesarean section rate reduced.
    Maher CF; Cave DG; Haran MV
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 34(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 7848224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Back to "once a caesarean: always a caesarean"? A trend analysis in Switzerland.
    Christmann-Schmid C; Raio L; Scheibner K; Müller M; Surbek D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 294(5):905-910. PubMed ID: 26980229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.
    Stavrou EP; Ford JB; Shand AW; Morris JM; Roberts CL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2011 Jan; 11():8. PubMed ID: 21251270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A case-control study of factors associated with caesarean sections at health facilities in Kabarole District, Western Uganda, 2016.
    Dusabe J; Akuze J; Kisakye AN; Kwesiga B; Nsubuga P; Ekirapa E
    Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 29():179. PubMed ID: 30050643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Maternal mortality in cesarean section as compared to vaginal delivery].
    Krone HA; Mattheus J
    Fortschr Med; 1975 Sep; 93(27):1266-8. PubMed ID: 1222926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Caesarean section and other methods for assisted delivery: comparison of effects on mare mortality and complications.
    Freeman DE; Hungerford LL; Schaeffer D; Lock TF; Sertich PL; Baker GJ; Vaala WE; Johnston JK
    Equine Vet J; 1999 May; 31(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 10402132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
    Sherrard A; Platt RW; Vallerand D; Usher RH; Zhang X; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.
    Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why women with previous caesarean and eligible for a trial of labour have an elective repeat caesarean delivery? A national study in France.
    Bartolo S; Goffinet F; Blondel B; Deneux-Tharaux C
    BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123(10):1664-73. PubMed ID: 27126956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of maximal cervical dilatation at primary caesarean delivery on mode of delivery in the following pregnancy.
    Onifade RA; Omigbodun AO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2003 Sep; 10(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 14692061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011].
    Hou L; Li G; Zou L; Li C; Chen Y; Yuan Y; Wang X; Jia C; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):728-35. PubMed ID: 25537242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Indications for caesarean delivery between 1955 and 2005.
    Bregar AT; Cerar VM; Slavec ZZ; Verdenik I
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2008; 120(23-24):761-5. PubMed ID: 19122988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.
    Golfier F; Vaudoyer F; Ecochard R; Champion F; Audra P; Raudrant D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Oct; 98(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11574129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.
    Ananth CV; Friedman AM; Keyes KM; Lavery JA; Hamilton A; Wright JD
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28346271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.